I've been watching Naoki Urasawa's monster recently. I saw the shadow of the third uncle of the Southern School.
In this work, success also lies in "pretending to be mysterious", and defeat also lies in "pretending to be mysterious". My evaluation standard, Samsung is similar to "Venom", with the same advantages and disadvantages, the director did not try to come up with a sophisticated framework, the screenwriter almost edited it, and the audience won't watch it a second time after watching it. Industrial film, unified Samsung. Samsung's range may be wider. . .
The monsters are mainly some points that I can't accept, so the score dropped a little.
My general opinion, if this movie gave John a little actual superpowers, while reducing the series to 50 episodes, I'd probably give it four stars. The current content is too convoluted, and more than half of the plot can't be taken seriously or thoughtfully (that is, when watching the plot, you must deliberately prevent yourself from resonating with it, because if you take it seriously, it is easy to have an illusion of the real world), but also can It can be regarded as a relatively high-quality, ingeniously designed tool for pastime and time-killing. From this point, I can give it a three-and-a-half star. But unfortunately, the work is too lengthy, so I can't help but deduct half a star and give it a total of three stars.
1. The suspenseful atmosphere is very good. In the beginning, John is mostly profiled and foiled, mainly describing what he did, and directly giving a shocking result, making John's image full of mystery and unknown, attracting the curiosity of the audience. Heart. It mainly uses techniques as a foil, using the results that are difficult to achieve in practice, and using the reactions of other characters to foil John. A common routine is to first describe a character's abilities, such as Baby, Hubert, and then use the person's attitude towards John to further enhance John's image. The problem is that Naoki Urasawa used many operations in the early stage to highlight John's image, which is completely unrealizable in reality. Just digging holes or filling them, the thunder is loud and the rain is small. In the end, a lot of things are either given a reluctant ending, or simply skipped. This also leads to the worst part of the show.
2. The characterization is blunt. The characters created, to be honest, I don't know if the author did some routine plots to drag the space, or for the so-called "exploration of human nature", or simply the author really wanted to express these things, in short, there are characters in it. The logic of behavior is very one-sided, the actual motivation for doing things is insufficient or too simple, and most of them are purely based on emotions to do things. Good people are good people, bad people are bad people, and there is no natural transition in between. It seems that as long as everyone gets better, they have to dig out their hearts and lungs and risk everything they have. As good as they are, as long as they get bad, they are as bad as being anti-social regardless of the consequences. In real life, most people are in a state of "chaotic and lawful". First of all, they must fully guarantee their own reasonable interests. Only when they have spare energy can they help others. Most of things are done tentatively. Once I feel that I have encountered a boundary, I will immediately respond, or ask for help, or stop, instead of blindly doing it all alone and taking risks alone. Others, such as Tianma at the scene of the library fire, first of all to deal with the errand and deceive himself and shoot twice, Nina does not shoot herself and does not let Tianma shoot (actually I can understand this) and then face to face and let John go directly. I really can't bear it Well, this plot is really too bloody, the author, you should let Tianma try to hit John, and then it’s okay to not hit him by accident (after all, John is a near-perfect creature, DIO!), I also It will be a little better, and I really can't stand it if I let him go and force me to act. I think this kind of characterization actually has a bad influence on adults "in the system" or young people who have not entered the society. The background and stage of this work are very realistic, and then the author designs the plot in this way on the stage full of reality, many young people will feel that "people in reality are really like this", but in fact they are not. is out of reality.
By the way, why are there so many keyboard warriors on the Internet now? It may also be because there are too many works that are out of reality, so that netizens' thinking about reality is easy to be extreme and one-sided, because what they use as a reference is not the logic and standards in reality.
3. What I personally can't tolerate the most is to try to discuss real issues with events that are out of reality. That's why I said at the beginning, you might as well give John some superpowers. I believe that the people who take this film as a standard are mostly people who don't know enough about the real real society. All people are mortals, and what they can do in the face of the future is limited, especially the micro-level operation of John, which is not exhaustive. Once the actual possibility is removed, many of John's actions are forcibly pretending to be forced, and the whole character becomes ridiculous in an instant, is there any essential difference from the boss of Sakamoto (may be a bit too much here). . . .
All in all, this show is worth watching, but don’t take it seriously when you watch it, just treat it as a pastime. You’ve watched too many of this kind of work, and if you take it seriously, people will become detached from reality, and it’s easy to become autistic. normal reality communication.
View more about Monster reviews
