I've only seen the fourth episode so far, I shouldn't watch it later, basically speaking
First, two stories: 1. A man invented software that could screen out the insurgents, was used by the CIA to monitor his own citizens without his knowledge, and successfully predicted and prevented him without his knowledge A potential terrorist attack, and then his entire department was killed, only he narrowly escaped, and was chased and shot on the way, and then hid in the female lawyer's house
2. A person invented software that can screen out the agents who have been instigated, but he is actually a spy . After he knows that he has prevented a terrorist attack, he will give up the software improvement that he may participate in next, and he may be able to Opportunity to get more information, choose to kill all of his colleagues to reveal his identity, and he was chased and killed when he escaped, and no one accepted him to leave, but hid in the female lawyer's house
Foreign organizations can see the surveillance video. I don’t believe that the CIA didn’t find that he was being hunted down. The female killer has shown her face. There are so many surveillance cameras. I don’t believe that he can escape the control of the CIA. Two stories, I really can't believe that a spy will do a waste operation, and it is also broadcast on the news. The CIA does not use news to send information to the protagonist. Under normal circumstances, you should not try to find a way to find him, and then judge what kind of situation it is, and see if he is willing to cooperate, etc. Now you have directly selected the spy camp for you, which is beyond my imagination.
The uncle of the protagonist, who has been working for most of his life, has no personal connections or right to speak in the CIA, so he can be directly overridden by just sending anyone, or even killing him. I don't know what my uncle did before. Then again, an organization like the CIA turned out to be a one-stop organization. Everyone is united as one, and no one will put forward any other opinions. Does the country really rely on such an internal harmonious organization to defend it? Why is it different from my view of homeland security? Aren't those in positions of power most afraid of the unity of the people below? Americans are so politically ignorant
The protagonist's friend Sam, as a traitor, has the fetters of his wife and children after 6 years of lurking, and he hesitates. The reason for his hesitation is not because of his wife and children, but because of his own friends. I originally planned to confess, but I gave up because I had a conversation with the protagonist's uncle that I didn't understand the deep meaning of. I don't quite understand this person's choice. He could choose to completely surrender to the CIA, ask for the protection of his wife and children, or continue his espionage work, but he chose to commit suicide, accompany the children first, then go to his friends, and then die. Death is worthless and incomprehensible. Does he have any conscience and moral conflict? No idea.
And the way the protagonist treats the female lawyer made me feel even more hypocritical. At first, I saw the CIA using software to monitor the American people. When discussing whether to bring him down directly, the protagonist showed disgust. The people violate human rights, and the protagonist, Sam, even said that the protagonist is a good person who will go back to save his friends. These screenwriters have strengthened the Virgin part of the protagonist, but the fake one is actually the Virgin on the surface. The protagonist breaks into the female lawyer's house and finds that he is wanted. He chooses to implicate innocent people. While the CIA is tackling the problem, he does not tie the female lawyer to stay, and creates the illusion that the female lawyer is just a victim. His IQ will not know that this is equivalent to declaring that the female lawyer is also his comrade, which directly harms the female lawyer's life. He fled to the neighbor's house and found the female killer. With the IQ of the protagonist, he would not know that the female killer appeared near the CIA and was looking for him, indicating that the CIA has a deep relationship with the hostile organization (of course, it is necessary to pretend that the CIA can't watch the surveillance video and does not know the girl) The killer has shown his face to kill the protagonist before), he still chooses to tell the female lawyer everything, doesn't he know that the more the female lawyer knows, the better? But he still did it.
In the end, can the female lawyer take things to spray the protagonist, but can't take a kitchen knife or something? As for the protagonist's escape, she didn't tie up or keep her mouth shut in the face of hostages. I don't know how many times she died. What did he use to make sure a single woman's home Wouldn't there be a gun? If the screenwriter hadn't said he was the protagonist, sorry.
View more about Condor reviews
