Analysis of "Death Radius"

Katrine 2022-12-21 10:39:03

Death Radius is a thriller with a big brain hole. In fact, in addition to the setting that the hero will die when you step into the radius of the hero, the movie has a fatalistic tragic color that you can't help yourself. People are a kind of group animal. , Groups are used to defining each member in terms of good and bad. Sometimes a good person may not always be a good person, and a bad person may not always be a bad person. It is easy to be a bad person, but difficult to be a good person. Accept, Liam's character likes to kill by nature, which seems to be a strange hobby in the original, maybe more caused by spiritual defects, some people are talented in basketball, some people like to draw, some people People like to watch movies, these hobbies are natural and written in the genetic code, and some people like to kill people, like Liam, sometimes I can't help but imagine if I was the Texas Chainsaw Massacre or any thriller The villain of the movie, whether I can eliminate the bloodthirsty nature, the answer is unknown, it is certain that such a nature cannot be accepted by the human group, so where should such an individual go? I am definitely not whitewashing those violent murderers. I just think that on the surface everyone is born free. In fact, nature more or less determines the future destiny. If you lack the correct enlightenment and education, you may be driven by nature all your life. There are chicken soup articles to live out their own appearance, but can people really live their own appearance? Liam, who was hit by ball lightning, seems to have amnesia as an opportunity, allowing him to re-choose the opportunity to be a human being. The radius where Liam will die when approaching is like a curse, this curse forced Liam to find The truth, the truth is cruel to the reborn Liam, the tragedy is that the reborn Liam doesn't want to kill anymore, he has a relatively normal personality, he wants to save everyone who walks into his radius, but accidentally hits Killed everyone who came close to him. Later, Rose appeared. Rose also lost her memory. The effect of the death radius did not work when Rose was there. Rose was willing to find the truth with Liam, partly because of the same experience. , On the other hand, Rose thinks Liam is a good person. In the end, the truth is revealed. Liam can't accept himself, and Rose can't accept Liam. The contradiction is that what Rose can't accept is the Liam who killed Lily in the past. Instead of Liam who is a new person, this is unfair and fair, and it is fair that Liam should be responsible for Lily's death. The injustice is that the bad Liam has disappeared, but the reborn Liam has to bear the sins of the past. When hatred and feelings met, Rose hesitated again. She had already realized that Liam was in her heart. The killer who killed Lily was just a shadow of how she felt that Liam was a good guy Her judgment on right and wrong was sounded, and Rose chose to escape. She couldn't kill Liam, and at the same time, she couldn't accept her feelings for Liam. When Rose was kidnapped by the bounty hunter, Liam The first time he took the initiative to kill someone, this time to save Rose, Liam wanted to be a good person, but the reality was that he killed people involuntarily. In the end, Liam took Rose to the hospital, and the nurse pushed Rose's emergency bed and disappeared. In front of Liam, Liam chose to commit suicide. When he committed suicide, Liam had tears in his eyes. Rose, who heard the gunshots, looked at the ceiling of the hospital aisle in pain, and Rose forgave Liam. The ending of the movie makes the movie jump out of the scope of stereotyped thrillers. The ending of Liam's suicide makes people blur the judgment of right and wrong. Liam, who is born to like to kill, is undoubtedly unworthy of sympathy, but why is God creating people? Is it really fair to make this man named Liam a bad guy? If God gave Liam a chance to be a new man, is Liam really right to kill the bounty hunter in the end? The clues that the bounty hunters got through TV news and various channels made their supervisors judge that Liam and Rose are extremely dangerous terrorists, so death is not a pity, so they beat the killer, and Liam believes that protecting Rose is the most important Yes, so he killed the bounty hunter. Neither side was wrong, but both sides had the will to kill. What is the difference between good and evil? Does Liam's suicide in the hospital at the end indicate that individuals who are unacceptable to the social collective can only choose to self-destruct? And Rose are extremely dangerous terrorists, so death is not a pity, so they kill the killer, and Liam thinks protecting Rose is the most important, so he kills the bounty hunter, both sides are not wrong, but both sides have Killing thoughts, what is the difference between good and evil? Does Liam's suicide in the hospital at the end indicate that individuals who are unacceptable to the social collective can only choose to self-destruct? And Rose are extremely dangerous terrorists, so death is not a pity, so they kill the killer, and Liam thinks protecting Rose is the most important, so he kills the bounty hunter, both sides are not wrong, but both sides have Killing thoughts, what is the difference between good and evil? Does Liam's suicide in the hospital at the end indicate that individuals who are unacceptable to the social collective can only choose to self-destruct?

View more about Radius reviews