The third episode of girlfriend is hard evidence of split personality

Mathilde 2022-04-03 08:01:01

My point of view is: the girlfriend is a split personality, and the most critical evidence that the
homeless is real is the mirror!

! !

Mirrors appear in many scenes in this episode.
Obviously, it is a thing that can easily lead to the wearing of shooting equipment,
but it can be seen everywhere in the male protagonist's house.
Of course, this is a way of expression deliberately done by the director.
Everyone knows that the inside and outside of the mirror is the truth and the truth. Fake relationship.
Therefore, mirrors are often used in film and television works to describe the split personality of the characters.
Male protagonists, homeless people and colleagues have all appeared in the mirror.




And although there is a mirror in every shot of the girlfriend, the
director seems to deliberately avoid her appearing in the mirror directly
.




In addition, only the male protagonist has seen his girlfriend,
so the girlfriend must be a split personality of the male protagonist

. The girlfriend went out to the audition and did not bring a change of clothes.
However, when the girlfriend came back the next morning, we could find that
she was the same from head to toe as when she went out the day before. dress completely different


It wasn't until many days later when the girlfriend made her last appearance
and wore the exact same clothes as her first appearance.


Because the girlfriend is the split personality
of the male protagonist, the clothes are always the fixed combinations

in the male protagonist's memory. When the male protagonist asked for leave for the first time, a
colleague left a message saying that he knew that the male protagonist was not good recently than when
he first came to the house to find the male protagonist. Saying
"I know you don't want to see me now"
"If you want to talk to someone, please call me."

If it's just because the male protagonist is on sick leave, there
is absolutely no need to say
that, it means that the male protagonist really encountered a major setback
at that time. At that time, my colleagues obviously didn't know the existence of homeless people,
so the allusion here can only be the death of my girlfriend.

In the opening scene, Bobo said that she had not acted for five months.
It is very likely that she had died five months ago and

ended up being homeless in the bathroom . The expression and lines show that he did not see the male protagonist's girlfriend
but saw the male protagonist talking to himself


Besides, the homeless
assumes that the homeless is a personality split by the male protagonist in order to escape from reality.
All defensive personalities are created to protect the main character. The
homeless not only failed to protect the male protagonist, but also kept cheating on him
, which made his life worse and worse.
So the tramp is the real living person who came to occupy the magpie's nest. On the

other hand, the girlfriend has been encouraging the male protagonist to cheer up, indicating that
he is the defensive personality split from the male

protagonist . But when it comes to the male lead's favorite writer, the tramp relies entirely on perseverance and guides the male lead to continue the topic. In contrast, the conversation between the male lead and his girlfriend, the name of the play where the girlfriend auditioned was changed from "D-Day Doris" to "D-Day Doris". After "Lucy land Girl" and finally changed back to "D-Day Doris", this is very unreasonable . The only explanation is that the male protagonist only remembers these two drama names that his girlfriend has played, so the personality of his split girlfriend can only be The most important real hammer to say these two names is that the real colleague did not see his girlfriend but saw the drowned homeless man in the end

















Some people may say that if even colleagues imagined it
, this episode is like a castle in the sky, completely detached from reality . It
violates the taboo in the script. It is
like a domestic horror movie
that always likes to attribute everything that happened before to the protagonist. The screenwriter of Mengben
obviously won't make such a low-level mistake
, and there is absolutely no reason to design such a failure.

If you still don't agree with my point of view
, please answer me a question . What is the negative emotion
of being lazy and not wanting to go to work and the death of your beloved girlfriend?
The stimulation is strong enough to make us split personality . The answer is already
obvious painting






When my colleague came to the male lead for the first time, I didn't see the homeless
. The homeless man said that the male lead has no right to accuse him
. These smoke bombs are all to pave the way for the three major reversals of the ending.

The first reversal of the
homeless man does exist.
He is close to the male lead . The real purpose is for Dou Zhan Que's Nest

to reverse the girlfriend for the second time,
pointing out that the homeless does not exist
, but the split personality of the
male protagonist to encourage the male protagonist to cheer up.

The third time reversed it again.
Colleagues pointed out that the girlfriend was a fantasy. Such
a vagabond is still a living person who wants to occupy the male protagonist's life but
is mistakenly killed by the male protagonist as a split personality The

above are some personal opinions . You are
welcome to leave a message to discuss
and discuss. ID: xppsdp) bye
bye

View more about Inside No. 9 reviews