terrible humanity

Gudrun 2022-04-04 09:01:08

There are many versions of this case online, and I don’t want to jump to conclusions, so I will share with you my views on the
relationship between the characters:
Amanda Knox, exchange student (student), American, (orally) not too related to the deceased I know each other by name, I have known each other for a few weeks, I just rent a roommate (the roommate has several other women), I have a messy sex life, and I used to have a lot of male partners (this content is what happened after the police threatened her with AIDS). The real content of the diary written; the truth is that she does not have AIDS), she likes to travel, and because of her mother's books, she fell in love with Italian culture and chose to go to Italy, which also shows the strength of the family conditions. at a classical concert. (Not a fabricated bar on the Internet) Items that prove to be the murderer, knives (Amanda's DNA on it, the victim's DNA on the blade, there are 2 official versions, one is the victim's DNA on the blade, and the other is the DNA on the blade is unknown) He lied once, saying that he had been at her boyfriend's house, and the text message explained that she went to the hotel owner to resign before returning to her boyfriend's house.

Rafaele Sollecito, who was confirmed to be a computer subject after verification, met the deceased through Amanda, not familiar, his hobby (collecting knives), no sexual experience, has a good convertible car , also revealed family living conditions. Murderer's Item: Bra elastic (with his DNA on it) lied once (after proving his girlfriend's alibi, then changed to say girlfriend Amanda wasn't at his house)

Berkeley Krumba, black, aka Oman Da's bar owner, and eventually she was fired by his boss. (Not what the hotel owner said on the Internet) There was no DNA or fingerprints of this person at the scene. This person can conclude that it has nothing to do with the case.

Rudy Herman Gade, black, a burglary with a previous conviction, the family conditions can be said to be very poor, knew the deceased (he said by himself), and neither Amanda nor her boyfriend, nor met, proves that It was the murderer's belongings: his excrement was found in the toilet in the deceased's room, the deceased had his semen and a lot of fingerprints, and lied twice; his first dictation: he met the deceased on the night road, and then excrement The origin of the story, as well as seeing the shadow of the murderer, and seeing the tragic state of the loved one; the second oral statement after the arrest: that the shadow is Amanda.

Meredith Kercher Victim, British student, cheerful, amiable, very conservative and traditional about sex, no promiscuous objects, dead features, signs of forcible control of arms, chin slit, slashes on both sides of the face Scar, tortured by abuse and teasing before his death, the fatal injury was to cut his throat with a sharp blade, and slowly bleed to death from the throat (indirect death). Surroundings: The windows were smashed, but no items were lost in the house (the official statement is a fake robbery), and the victim's house was locked.

Through all the evidence gathered above, I personally think that there are 2 types of this case:
Amanda is not present, and Amanda and his boyfriend are no longer present. At the same time, there is a detail that when he was talking to his friend (an informant arranged by the police), he talked about the whole process of the case, But he still concealed Amanda and his boyfriend (someone here will say, why didn't they explain everything when they were arrested? I just want to say that the number of Gade's bribes is not low, and Amanda and her boyfriend's family can be considered high. A rich man can let him not live a life of stealing after he is released from prison, and there is no death penalty after being arrested. If he refuses to admit it, he can also have his sentence commuted. The final appeal will only take 16 years, and it will be a win-win after he comes out). These conjectures of mine are all imagined based on Gade's confession, which is his first confession, conjecture. After all, all the strong evidence is in Gade, the semen DNA in the body, the excrement in the toilet, and the large number of Gade fingerprints in the room. Let me tell you about the second type.

Second: Gade entered the house at night and stole it. As a result, he turned around and found nothing of value. Then he went to the toilet to excrete with a stomachache. After he came out, he found that the victim had entered the house and threatened the victim with violence. At this time, the victim saw that there were knives in the room (this The knife was used by Amanda or the roommate's door), and then used the knife to save herself, but failed, was seized by the knife, held the victim violently with her hand, scratched the victim's chin with the knife, threatened her, made her obedient, and then raped her The victim, at this time the victim was still screaming and screaming. Gade panicked and cut the victim's throat with a knife. Seeing that the victim hadn't died, he still looked at him. He was afraid to cover the victim with a quilt. De, went into the toilet and washed his hands with the faucet, then stood on the blanket in the bathtub, rinsed with the shower head to calm himself, after calming down, he created the illusion of robbery and murder, and then rummaged around the bed to find the room key ( This also explains why so many Gade's fingerprints in the room, especially on the bed and beside the bed) locked the victim's door and escaped from the fake window. As for why I think so, because of the second dictation, why Amanda is involved, they don't know each other, why mention them. Because this all happened after the murder, Amanda and her boyfriend were arrested, and the news media amplified the report, who doesn't know? In order to absolve himself of the crime, he forcibly said that he saw Amanda running out of the room. As for the DNA of Amanda's boyfriend on the bra, I can't give an explanation for the second conjecture, only the first one I imagined makes sense.

Anyway, Gade is definitely the murderer, the excrement in the toilet, the semen in the victim's body, it all explains it (Amanda and her boyfriend are also very likely to be accomplices, after all, the DNA on the bra on the knife says it all. ) After the analysis of the whole case, I get goosebumps, my hair stands on end, and the ugliness and lies of human nature will also become evidence to exonerate myself from the crime. I can only say that the victim Meredith Kercher was really pitiful and was brutally murdered In the future, the criminals have not been given a fair punishment in the end, and they are still at large! Finally, I recommend everyone to watch a movie called Gone Girl. After reading it and then look at the Amanda incident, you will feel that any similarities are purely coincidental!

View more about Amanda Knox reviews

Extended Reading

Amanda Knox quotes

  • Nick Pisa - Freelance Journalist, The Daily Mail: But hey, what are we supposed to do? We are journalists and we are reporting what we are being told. It's not as if I can say "Hold on a minute, I just want to double check that myself in some other way, who knows how, and I'll let my rival get in there first before me, and then, hey, I've lost a scoop." It doesn't work like that, not in the news game.

  • [last lines]

    Amanda Knox - Murder Suspect: I think people love monsters. So when they get the chance, they want to see them. It's people projecting their fears. They want the reassurance that they know who the bad people are and it's not them. So maybe that's what it is. We're all afraid. And fear makes people crazy.

Related Articles