The film's ratings and reviews are average, and I downloaded it because it is said that the space scenery is beautiful. Today, under the trend of the expansion of the number of movies, there are many phenomena that appear or magnify, such as heroic movies, such as uneven quality of works. Then I thought, with my current movie readings of about 2,000, under the premise that the value system is basically established, many times the evaluation of the movie is whether it is valuable or not. The excitement of encountering a "high-resolution" work, my intuition, touch, or any five-sense word to describe it, is acute. I'm probably a craftsman too. ——Although he is conscious, it is still out of time to brag about his achievements in advance, hehe. When a high resolution meets a high resolution, excitement increases, concentration increases, and information interaction becomes more frequent. This high resolution is not necessarily the same field, and it can be basically connected across lines. For example, my sense of reading, film, and running has reached the level of deep enough amateurism, and I am working hard to move towards a quasi-professional, reading frame, coverage, depth, film reading, function, region, era, time, pace. , physical fitness, etc., are things that I am currently working on. Talking about movies, starring and directing, they have attracted the attention of most moviegoers. In terms of works, works like movies have too many tools on top of them. Director, screenwriter, starring, camera, soundtrack, logistics, investment, censorship, family atmosphere, national atmosphere, economic situation, neighborhood situation, local residents and government atmosphere, gossip media, fans, film critics are very powerful And profoundly affect the shape of the work. At present, the biggest difference between literature and film and television is probably the number of craftsmen, or the influencing factor. A good film either has a quality that surpasses the same type of works of the same period, or has a good rhythm, or explores and achieves a certain style in a single quality such as tone, soundtrack, material selection, shooting techniques, etc., Or put on a certain label (Woody Allen, Eastwood, Akira Kurosawa, Angel, etc.), or,. A good work is difficult to evaluate, especially when the work comes from, say, twenty years and is evaluated by contemporaries—if the work itself can go through tens or even hundreds of years, then such an objective and hard-core quality, It is difficult for ordinary people to resist and cannot be erased. However, for works that do not have an advantage in age, for those works that have not separated themselves and the audience through the thick fog of history, such as culture, economy, war, politics, and emotion, and successfully penetrated the thick fog, how to treat it? Value, how to evaluate its weight, how to choose the excellent and unique from the ordinary, the ordinary, the vulgar, the ignorant and the arrogant, and become a This is a difficult problem that no one can judge. After entertainment, it even becomes a topic and is happily consumed. I have always been comfortable with short-handed methods, and I am no exception when it comes to film evaluations (this can be traced back to the source. After entering the house of Cards and looking back at my own experience 10 years later, I have become a persistent but not stubborn ruthless pragmatist) . However, being short and fast is an active coping strategy in a passive situation of increasing processing power, but it cannot be used for a long time as a tool to measure whether a movie has value or not. What is it. I have an idea. With the concept in the previous paragraph, in an environment without evaluation pressure, you can look for high-resolution among reviewers, or catch a few high-resolution doujinshi to add attention, and then go into their film library to find works that make their eyes sparkle. . This is a tricky way, and it does not necessarily increase one's own cultivation and ability. However, human civilization is like this. Many things cannot be explained clearly, and many things are not easy to explain (to people) either because of cruelty or embarrassment. For the evaluation of film value, this tool has no more objectivity and "accuracy" than time. As a film (value) ruler, as an art (value) ruler, and as a work (value) ruler, its performance is also time. Can't be compared. However, as entertaining, trends don't last long, and don't have enough energy (no powerful voice on the subject of evaluating film value) on a par with those looking for high resolutions, I propose/discover that this Tools are also to deal with the embarrassment, helplessness and urgency of not having time and tools. Of course, here's a bit more daring to be naughty. I feel that I am still talented. In addition to looking for high-resolution people, Sajia is also working hard to build myself into a powerful high-resolution. This is what I used in my emotional life after many years. The road ahead is long, and the starry night is on the way." Let's strengthen the embodiment of the will to move forward. ~. ~. . . . . . . . . . . Damn, I wrote so much, exciting slowly, procrastinating, and failing. pragmatist). However, being short and fast is an active coping strategy in a passive situation of increasing processing power, but it cannot be used for a long time as a tool to measure whether a movie has value or not. What is it. I have an idea. With the concept in the previous paragraph, in an environment without evaluation pressure, you can look for high-resolution among reviewers, or catch a few high-resolution doujinshi to add attention, and then go into their film library to find works that make their eyes sparkle. . This is a tricky way, and it does not necessarily increase one's own cultivation and ability. However, human civilization is like this. Many things cannot be explained clearly, and many things are not easy to explain (to people) either because of cruelty or embarrassment. For the evaluation of film value, this tool has no more objectivity and "accuracy" than time. As a film (value) ruler, as an art (value) ruler, and as a work (value) ruler, its performance is also time. Can't be compared. However, as entertaining, trends don't last long, and don't have enough energy (no powerful voice on the subject of evaluating film value) on a par with those looking for high resolutions, I propose/discover that this Tools are also to deal with the embarrassment, helplessness and urgency of not having time and tools. Of course, here's a bit more daring to be naughty. I feel that I am still talented. In addition to looking for high-resolution people, Sajia is also working hard to build myself into a powerful high-resolution. This is what I used in my emotional life after many years. The road ahead is long, and the starry night is on the way." Let's strengthen the embodiment of the will to move forward. ~. ~. . . . . . . . . . . Damn, I wrote so much, exciting slowly, procrastinating, and failing. pragmatist). However, being short and fast is an active coping strategy in a passive situation of increasing processing power, but it cannot be used for a long time as a tool to measure whether a movie has value or not. What is it. I have an idea. With the concept in the previous paragraph, in an environment without evaluation pressure, you can look for high-resolution among reviewers, or catch a few high-resolution doujinshi to add attention, and then go into their film library to find works that make their eyes sparkle. . This is a tricky way, and it does not necessarily increase one's own cultivation and ability. However, human civilization is like this. Many things cannot be explained clearly, and many things are not easy to explain (to people) either because of cruelty or embarrassment. For the evaluation of film value, this tool has no more objectivity and "accuracy" than time. As a film (value) ruler, as an art (value) ruler, and as a work (value) ruler, its performance is also time. Can't be compared. However, as entertaining, trends don't last long, and don't have enough energy (no powerful voice on the subject of evaluating film value) on a par with those looking for high resolutions, I propose/discover that this Tools are also to deal with the embarrassment, helplessness and urgency of not having time and tools. Of course, here's a bit more daring to be naughty. I feel that I am still talented. In addition to looking for high-resolution people, Sajia is also working hard to build myself into a powerful high-resolution. This is what I used in my emotional life after many years. The road ahead is long, and the starry night is on the way." Let's strengthen the embodiment of the will to move forward. ~. ~. . . . . . . . . . . Damn, I wrote so much, exciting slowly, procrastinating, and failing. Dare to be naughty again, I feel that I am still talented. In addition to looking for high-resolution people, Sajia is also working hard to build myself into a powerful high-resolution. , Starry Night" to strengthen the embodiment of the will to move forward. ~. ~. . . . . . . . . . . Damn, I wrote so much, exciting slowly, procrastinating, and failing. Dare to be naughty again, I feel that I am still talented. In addition to looking for high-resolution people, Sajia is also working hard to build myself into a powerful high-resolution. , Starry Night" to strengthen the embodiment of the will to move forward. ~. ~. . . . . . . . . . . Damn, I wrote so much, exciting slowly, procrastinating, and failing.
View more about Cargo reviews
