The plot leads people to follow the protagonist involuntarily. It gives the impression that the incident of kidnapping makes the rich and the bankrupt equal in an instant. They are in a dilapidated house, looking at each other and testing each other, hoping to get a little bit of each other's attitude, he wants to save his life, he wants him to be honest, he wants mercy , he relieved his stress by talking to him... But a sum of money is not worth mentioning on the one hand, just want to die; feel sympathy. They calculated everything, and did not take their mental suffering into account, and they fell short, because they were not pure villains... It's a pity and a pity to suffer such a big crime, but it's a pity for others... At that moment, they and the Heineken lived and died. Wealth and poverty seem so close... So people outside the market think they are all smart people, why is life so different, if only they could make money like Heineken? Dignified and capable... Thinking of the kidnapping case "Saving Mr. My" starring Andy Lau last year, the events and people in this movie are not as terrifying as they are, I'm just trying to figure out how to escape the pursuit like them... ... Later, one of the main culprits became the "Dutch Godfather", which shows that the so-called not pure bad guys are also very close! The three views seem to have been moved secretly, and the film is weak. From this perspective, the propaganda seems to be able to whitewash the kidnappers. "I'm just desperate. I can't bear to kill him. A wicked person like "My Mr." can't be a good person no matter how desperate he is. The so-called understanding is to think: "Do you want to kidnap others?" Think again "Do you want to be kidnapped?" Think both ways
View more about Kidnapping Mr. Heineken reviews
