"Yes, it's very feminist."

Alec 2022-09-29 19:14:45

Energy depletion ("A system that used to work well in the past begins to fail".) - "Father" stores gasoline for "essential activities that require electricity" ("Decayed people are still doing things by the rules of the old system", "Necessary" The reason why "activities" are necessary is that they are "bred up".) - After the sister was raped, she insisted on keeping the child and gave birth to the child in the place where the sister and her bf loved each other (for "political correctness", the child is right even if he is Dad molested his mother; besides, how can you reflect "female greatness" in a short period of time if you don't keep the child after being raped? Women are there
Isn't it "poetic" in itself to give birth to a new life in the place where we had sex, in that little treehouse (female-nature) with an entrance like a pussy? )- Sister questioned how long human beings have been around & how long has electricity appeared (Well… I can live without electricity, let’s go! Let’s go hunting game with my sister… eh? Where is my flashlight?)- "The raped sister" uses "gasoline" "burn the house" (that man is a deformed individual under the influence of this malfunctioning system, so as a male he must rape my sister to show how bad the system is. With the "emergence of new life", originally under the protection of the old system How can the "house" not "collapse"? Then the "house" is no longer a "home". As a symbolic power, "gasoline" can not only be used to maintain the operation of the system, but also be used to destroy the system ——Although there are various points in the front, the concept of gasoline burning house is very good, but it is too hasty in the movie)... All these settings are very obvious, and at the same time there are many blunt and deliberate elements, such as "Father must die", "Sister must be raped", "Sister must give birth to a child in the place of sister ml"... The "father's death" in the film was deliberately "taken with a single stroke", and the father, except for a few dispensable last words, "it hurts so much" Ah! Oops! I'm going to die... I'm going to die..." I died _(:з"∠)_. The girls also "use their father's body as a pillow when they are tired from crying" (on the correct usage of the father) - "After waking up (from the father), the body is useless anyway, so just bury it" - "When burying, there is no expression on the face. ("Father is finally dead") - "Remembering the relatives and crying" (actually crying for themselves - some kind of beauty that used to exist in their world was forcibly taken away - used to living under the protection of the father After the sudden severing of the bond with the father and the temporary discomfort - but this is the only way for them to go to freedom) - all this shows that the "father" in it is but a tool that can be used when necessary. It's just an empty shell to advance the plot, a tool that can be used to show the creator's personal ideas. "Why did my father die?" - Because my father committed a taboo, he even tried to saw a tree with "electricity", which is a blasphemy for the director and screenwriter who is trying to "enter (back) into the forest" so Only to die - yes, it's very feminist.


Similar to "I just love dogs - dogs are friends of people - no cannibalism - you are not allowed to decide the life and death of stray dogs - so even if I don't adopt these stray dogs, you can't do anything about me." Make people feel good (as long as I want, I can always find reasons to explain my behavior without considering the possible impact of my behavior on others, and in fact the reason is more to "maintain my some kind of fantasy"; for example "a dog is a friend of man", the question is how does the dog "see" him being made a "friend" of man?) and then? As shown in the film, in a side-by-side way: it turns out that the problem of energy depletion can also be linked to "a problem with the system". You are holding it tightly.” If the problem is not caused by you, is it still up to us?), what should I do? Either choose to "return to the forest" and go back to before liberation; or burn the house and pose to show that you are "politically correct", but it's understandable to send a phone and extravagance every now and then... Jian! Decision! No! go with! Wave! scholar! pause! ——“Don’t bother me, I just want to be a double-standard party quietly.”

3 stars gave this film some of the expressions that have appeared in this film, other than that, this film is still worth watching-if you are a feminist ideology, then it helps you understand what the pig teammates are thinking about all day.


In general, the film is awkward, but there are some bright spots - such as "gasoline", although I don't agree with the use of this "gasoline" originally used to keep the system running to destroy the system (although it is a symbol, Very "poetic", but in fact "can only be your house"), but is "gasoline" really that precious? Sisters deserve such a spat over it? Even in a world that has almost lost its power supply? - Do we really need a "gas-filled car"? Could we live in another way without electricity?

We can see this kind of vigilance from the behavior of "burning the house with gasoline" - don't think that everything that exists and happens around you is "natural" and "reasonable", just think about "money", "house", "Cars"...does all this really matter? Are these really our "just needs"? Or are we "in some subtle way" trained to "need these things" to live? - Not that we have to "go back to the forest" to live like our ancient ancestors, but try to think about whether we have any other needs or pursuits if we put aside our constant attention to these things for a while? I think everyone will have their own answer.

However, we should also note that as long as "electricity improves the quality of human life (which varies from person to person), the efficiency of labor production, and the efficiency of communication activities," what harm does its existence do to human beings? ——In addition to worrying about the depletion of energy and the "damage" to the natural environment (in what sense is it destruction?), we should pay more attention to the issue of energy development, especially the energy conversion efficiency, instead of always implying that "the system is about to collapse" ”, and people will be “liberated” as a result.

You have the freedom to choose yourself (or with some people) to live a life of fishing and fruit picking on an isolated island - you can always choose to "break out of the oppression of the system" and "return to the forest" to "find the truth" or get some kind of "Spiritual return" but please don't think that as long as others don't think "the system is wrong" as you do and "go back to the forest" then they are a bunch of "blinded people" because in fact you can't be like them at all Knowing if you are "blindfolded" - how do you prove that your "back to the woods" behavior is not the result of "another kind of being blindsided"?

View more about Into the Forest reviews