. Chinese people may misunderstand
that this film is a propaganda film for the promotion of teachings and movements. The
director is promoting his Zeitgeist Movement,
TZM the Venus Project (Venus Project) ) The Venus Project film has action doctrines
and rules behind it. Because
of popular and internet debates So of course it can be called the Zeitgeist of the Zeitgeist . However, I personally think that these are simply the American version of the series of compass leaf professors: they are all good and progressive theories that others have put forward. The golden sentences are connected by inexplicable logic . It's a flying conclusion. The movement is controversial not because he recorded the zeitgeist but because he did not want to record the zeitgeist. He incorporates the zeitgeist (now the most popular theory in the world): such as the political system, capitalism, the US currency, debt system, racism, homosexuality, equality , environmental issues, such as the advantages of technology, and the new reformed socialism (new communism) into his It is logical to harvest his doctrine into his own movement (more precisely, a harvest-style cult) and make himself the initiator to steal the credit of other people's past theories and movements, and seize the right to speak, concentrate it for his own use , and then execute his own. Inexplicably radical fascism:
Destruction currency technology management robot completely replaces labor and people do not work,
but
the execution strategy inside is simply laughing to death
. The movement of the times got his ideas from the Venus project. The
Venus project has at least worked
and is industry and construction. Grandpa of design type (same day as me, standard cult leader spec)
but Venus project is vulnerable to the execution of this zeitgeist movement
time relationship I take what has been discussed elsewhere about
Venus project The logic problem of the painting
(according to Wikipedia and the introduction video The Venus Project: Paradise or Oblivion)
1. Basically, barter is a transaction system,
and the currency system is only the optimization result of the transaction system.
As long as there is a transaction, it will be Will evolve
now he advocates bartering is just adding alternative sys to this system
so the elimination of money is an inexplicable theory
there will always be a monetary system just a substitution of nouns
and in this movement and Venus plan to eliminate money The definition of money is a confusing concept.
If it is ignorance, it means lack of knowledge.
If it is intentional, it is very evil
(advocating and shaking society with things that cannot be done have nothing to do with solving the current problems)
2. I am a person like advanced automation technology. I think it is a kind of technocratic thinking flow.
This will lead to a dictatorial society instead of a grassroots democratic society.
Mechanization will lead to more dictatorship and more authoritarianism
. I have said this when discussing robots and morality
. 3. His system is light {pathway } This one knows that it is not feasible
Since ancient times {this tree is planted by me, this road is my own, if I want to pass by and stay here to buy road money}
this kind of currency disappears and public power disappears, there will be rogue gang organizations.
If public power is needed to settle the right of way problem
, then currency It will appear
that this is a thinking flow theory without careful thinking and no economic concept.
In addition, barter can only exist in a system of small countries and few people.
As long as small communities and small settlements expand, large territories and long distances are
centralized and the currency system is bound to exist. Formation
is an inevitable trend
4. The so-called use of technology to manage and the level of technological strength is an unfair statement . The
so-called technological strength and the people who possess technology are already an unfair starting point.
How can there be a fair start
, let alone The development of science and technology is related to the overflow of military energy and the global surveillance program.
Microsoft is developing under the authorization of IBM, the US military,
and IBM is responsible for the hardware of the computer popularization program. The
current technology brings many free and welfare benefits of technology design
. It is caused by the high rationalism and high-level intellectual sentiments of these technological upstarts,
but not all technological people have such good virtues. They must pursue equality or the pursuit of the human gospel
. Taking Facebook as an example, it is a technological force. The negative evidence
is not easy to use at all
, so technology power cannot be a 100% solution.
In addition, current technology is an important culprit in consuming resources. This is far from their
goals of environmental protection, restraint and energy saving . The argument of being
the key to execution and solving the resource problem is
weird and weak
, so the false leader abdicates and let me be the deity
And aside from the absurd execution strategy of mass-producing (well, the product is cheap and good) so that everyone can use it to flatten the demand
(I think if you've seen the video, you should also really think about the reality of the product and the impact of production volume. Environmental issues
, mass production, etc. The words are clearly the old concept of the capitalist industrial revolution, etc.)
and in addition to the fact that the scholars in the film all say that desire is impossible to grow indefinitely,
why does the conclusion lead to the use of robots to make people not In addition to the contradictory logic of work and mass manufacturing,
there is also the fact that agricultural production by machines is closely related to the mass application of pesticides and fertilizers. It is not environmentally friendly at all.
I think they also forget this connection.
The logic and strategy of the Zeitgeist movement film have the following other problems:
1. "Spirit of the Times: The Best Featured Step Forward - Resource-Oriented Economy"
The video mentions the issue of use and return of the right of use.
Just taking the failure of ubike in New Taipei City can be slapped in the face.
Small places like Taipei City can do this. Because of the density
, but the distance increases and the time increases, the demand
will be like the failure of ubike in New Taipei City.
These have long been in the planning theory and design theory.
New Taipei City Zhutou did not expect that the superstition technology does not even consider the
amount of variation caused by the area and distance.
When the distance is unpredictable,
his right to use will immediately have problems
. Just like the ubike in New Taipei City, the distance causes problems
, and the ubike in Taipei City will have a shortage of resources in some areas
because of the difference between the work place and the home. The difference
will cause the car to spend money and other foreign aid to return it.
This is the simplest example of slap in the face
2. In addition to the advanced module technology 3D printing technology he mentioned as a method to solve architectural problems, the
comprehensive system design of urban design proposed by the leader of the film
is more
simple. He knows that one person needs a year. How much area of rice to eat and how
much demand does his city need to meet?
How much allowance does his city have? Does he know how much to calculate? More
practical exploration: Is
all land really that livable and resource-rich
?
How to solve the environmental pressure in the living area?
He didn't deal with it at all, just thought about using the best situation to interpret his fantasy
It will be added later) but to eliminate money to correct abnormal behavior. Is this only his theory that justice should be implemented? His justice is justice. This inconsistency and trustworthy person really has a problem with logic . 4. Whose sustainability is the sustainability brought about by his robot? Have you ever thought about the number of laborers he cited deleted, but it will be There is a problem with other companies receiving this narration. First , are other companies funded by the company that deleted the employees? Second, do n't you know that the development of tourism is a way to respond to the relocation of industries, and the development of tourism can be developed without going through industrial development, so how can there be a service industry only after the industry has deleted the population? In addition, is the replacement of the service industry profiting from labor?
At this point, he avoids talking
about automation guaranteeing the sustainability of factory owners and businesses rather than the sustainability of the proletariat without capital to buy robots.
5. What's even more funny is that this theory called technology
mentions the suggestion of oil in this film It’s best to use less unless necessary.
He doesn’t know that the technology industry has the greatest demand for plastic. A
bunch of computer technology materials are covered with plastic
.
In addition to this large-scale monitoring, he may not have counted how much the earth's resources are consumed.
Monitoring does not mean that it can be managed. It can only represent the information provided.
Real management requires power
and
power . It is the money and weapons who will start and who will come out.
In addition
, even if you monitor the natural resources, it is the most difficult to predict and control
. You can monitor the growth of the general situation,
but it is impossible to manage the lack of resources caused by the big ice, snow, fire, and earthquake.
At this time, the monitoring has So
how to deploy and manage
must need public power
, public power, weapons and currency system
, so how to eliminate the currency system?
And it goes back to the circle of who can have public power, who can provide weapons and who can provide money
. This movement cannot answer the loop. In the
summary above, I will not put
the discussion on the composition of the currency state organization, the human nature system, the public power, and the government here. I don’t need to put too much here, but I said one of the biggest questions they did not answer:
Who is the initiator of fairness after the eradication of currency,
how to define
who to distribute , and
how to avoid gangs (there will be gangs without public power)
who has public power (if there is public power, weapons are needed)
Who will pay for the weapons executed by public power?
Who is the initiator and the payer is this doctrine and movement is completely unanswerable
and absurd in the
Venus Project and the Zeitgeist movement is a reaping cult that
harvests all the hot ideas as a stepping stone to its own reputation
but the action that pays is too It's vague and the strategy tends to be evil
. Replacing human work with robots What happens when we need each other again We know that parents are the most selfish and selfish behavior towards their children. They are only good to children, but children still rely on them because they need their parents, so they have the morality of filial piety and obedience. If there is no demand for each other , will people be cold and cruel , and the power unit with robots can more effectively provide robots with sufficient resources to screen for population qualifications and allocate population numbers? I think China is very aware of this strategy or even has it ? Possibility of population extermination? Because in fact, people don't need a lot of things to think about making a movie and want to promote it as a movement . Have you become an evil pusher?
In addition to such a remark that does not rely on general, how much money is behind
a bunch of people as pushers?
?
Have these theoretical activists ever thought about the elimination of money to eliminate the currency of organizations? ?
Finally, I observed that this group of supporters of the Zeitgeist movement in Taiwan should have something to do with political groups: "The Power of the Times" and even the political inclination is
Taiwan independence . Well, it's just like people's vision for a better future. As for whether or not to let this future happen, that's another story." With all due respect: even if there are good things happening in the future, it won't be this . Harvest caused by cult. Amen
View more about Zeitgeist: Moving Forward reviews
