lost in adaptation

Joesph 2021-10-22 14:33:45

I haven't watched Nicolas Cage play such a good film for a long time. After watching Ghost Rider, I almost despair of his film. . . But maybe the success of this movie is due to the screenwriter Charlie Kaufman. Recently, his screenwriter Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is also very popular, very good. What’s interesting is that the role played by Nicolas in the play is also called Charlie Kaufman. He is a movie screenwriter who hates himself and cannot communicate with his closest twin brothers. The bottleneck of work and the failure of feelings came one after another, which almost made him collapse. . In order to adapt a bland book with no ending into a script, he got into trouble, and his twin brothers helped him finish the script and wrote a wow them in the end ending. The peculiar thing about this film is that the film itself, Nicolas's script, Susan's book, and the real life in the film are intertwined. It seems chaotic but clear. There are many good lines in the movie, some excerpts:
If you'd really loved something, wouldn't a little bit of it linger? Evidently his finishes were downright and absolute. He just moved on. I sometimes wished I could do the same.
It's easier for plants. They have no memory. They just move on whatever's next. But for a person, adapting's almost shameful. It's like running away.
There are too many ideas and things and people. Too many directions to go. I was starting to believe the reason it matters to care about something is that it whittles the world down to a more manageable size.
Life seemed to be filled with things that were just like the ghost orchid. Wonderful to imagine and easy to fall in love with but a little fantastic and fleeting and out of reach.
That was her business, not mine. You are what you love, not what loves you.
PS Meryl Streep The narration is so good, I remember I bought the film tape of Out of Africa in my freshman year, and I fell in love with her
beautiful voice at that time, ha ha. . .

View more about Adaptation. reviews

Extended Reading
  • Edyth 2022-03-21 09:01:28

    The angle is very good, the plot at the end is sloppy and bloody, and I feel that the psychological foreshadowing of the previous protagonist has become worthless in an instant.

  • Rosalia 2022-03-23 09:01:29

    2006.8.3/4/5 Original title novel by Susan OrleanFor the little Lanben among them, a bizarre story that is both beautiful and full of irony is told with double lines and virtual characters. Adaptation - the biggest irony of Hollywood

Adaptation. quotes

  • John Laroche: [viewing an orchid at a flower show] Angraecum sesquipedale! A beauty! God! Darwin wrote about this one. Charles Darwin? Evolution guy? Hello? You see that nectary all the way down there? Darwin hypothesized a moth with a nose twelve inches long to pollinate it. Everyone thought he was a loon! Then, sure enough, they found this moth with a twelve-inch proboscis. Proboscis means "nose," by the way.

    Susan Orlean: I know what "proboscis" means.

    John Laroche: Yeah, let's not get off the subject. This isn't a pissing contest!

  • John Laroche: Look, I'll tell you a story, all right? I once feel deeply, you know, profoundly in love with tropical fish. Had 60 goddamn fish tanks in my house. I skin dived to find just the right ones. Anisotremus virginicus, Holdacanthus ciliaris, Chaetodon capistratus. You name it. Then one day I say, "fuck fish". I renounce fish. I vow never to set foot in that ocean again. That's how much "fuck fish".