In fact, the second filming of this film posed a problem for the director. The first film won a good box office because the content of the film was very fresh and all the animals on display in the museum were resurrected. What about the second one? Is it still resurrected? The answer is yes, the key lies in how to resurrect who is resurrected. The director Sean Levy adopted a model of bigger words and more characters, and everyone used their best to make the audience laugh. But in terms of the plot, I don't think the first step can be handled well, although the first one is not very good.
Watch the trailer and say how awesome the special effects of this film are, how realistic it is, and it's a comedy. After watching it, I feel that the plot is very simple, playing personal heroism, leading the justice team to defeat the evil team, and there must be love in the middle (it is similar to Roman holiday love, but it is not comparable to the Roman holiday movie). Many protagonists and supporting roles, I think one is made of wood, in order to complete each task but to do things, or that this film is positioned as a comedy, it must be funny, so many times the lines are to make you funny. Funny, of course some people laughed because they thought it was funny, and some people thought they laughed when others laughed, but I dozed off.
I think this may be a matter of cultural differences. I always can't understand what is funny about those things or plots. Even those very interesting translation lines, of course, I have to translate. Since the war against aliens, our translation level has been improved, and we have achieved better localization. When there are no real rubies here, they are fake treasures, Xiudou Most of the audience laughed when humorous vocabulary such as, death, burp, etc. appeared. I always feel that this is done deliberately.
Of course, the production of this film is still very good, the scene makeup music is good, the imagination is also very rich, all kinds of messy, famous and unnamed people from various historical periods gather together, like a pot of laba porridge, you can't think of it. All appeared in this movie, and as a Hollywood commercial film, it is still very qualified.
In addition to making me doze off, the ending is really thrilling for me. Why do you have to make this ending? Sometimes imperfection is perfect. Brother Sean Levy, please, don't always use this older generation's solution, can you? Too vulgar too vulgar.
If you don't be too demanding, as a Hollywood commercial film, this film is still very good as a relaxing film for the whole family. It is a film that can be enjoyed with only eyes and ears without a brain. Although I dozed off in the middle, it is a good choice to watch such a movie during this short vacation. Sometimes it’s nice to laugh foolishly, to yourself, to others, even if you don’t know why, isn’t it good?
View more about Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian reviews
