So he began to slowly recall how he became like this.
He did a lot of crazy things, but, first and foremost, he was a singer. No matter how jerk he is, how ignorant of the world, he is a good singer. When he saw the president, he took the initiative to ask to perform in Vietnam. I don't know if it was artistic. His plane was hit by an engine and finally exploded. But he was fearless, and from here he mentioned his mother for the first time, a person who had a great influence on him. Then I went swimming.
By the time I got back from swimming, his career had plummeted, his employees offered to leave, and then he forced one of his close friends away and was alone ever since. When he finally drove away, a child came down.
He was imprisoned in 1988, wanted to make a comeback in 1993, and finally when he walked to the stage, he appeared in all his stages, everyone, i pay the cost, be the boss. The last is a happy ending that I like, his friend forgives him and occasionally joins his show.
As a biographical film, the actor was responsible for shaping the prototype, so he gave it 4 stars. It's just that the rhythm is too slow, I haven't understood his songs, and I don't know how to appreciate them. But I might find a time to lie down and watch this 138-minute movie by myself.
------------Delimited line of description------- For
biographical film works, the prototype must have great achievements or flashes of personality. This review of my film - if you don't like it, think of it as an essay for elementary school students - is about the plot of the movie or the way it was filmed, which I don't like, and has nothing to do with the prototype.
A good director makes a biographical film of a celebrity that many people can't understand. Is the film good or bad? Is it just because the prototype is awesome that the movie looks good? In this case, what is the difference with the YY anti-Japanese TV series.
That's all.
View more about Get on Up reviews
