This is actually the growth process of a prosecutor who believes in the justice of the law, but the background of this growth process is the Auschwitz trial. I always agree that the law is the will of the ruling class, so what law should the SS serving in Auschwitz be judged by? I believe it has been a big issue for a long time. If it is the level of war crimes against humanity, it should be in the field of international law. , Poland and Israel specially legislate for those Nazi officers who were tried locally. In Germany, if the SS obeyed the sovereign orders at that time, what law and what crime should they be charged with? Thinking about it this way, this The Auschwitz trial in Frankfurt is actually more of a non-legal meaning, because I always find it too far-fetched. Having said that, I will go back to the first sentence of the prosecutor who believes in the justice of the law. If he investigates and prosecutes according to this original intention, it will be painful. The law has never been equal to justice. While he re-understood the meaning of the trial, he also revealed the attitude of ordinary Germans towards the war and the racially discriminatory massacre represented by Auschwitz. Who is blind? Is it the common people who deceive themselves, or the "righteous" people who just want to expose their scars while putting on a good life? Was the German people who joined the Nazis at that time forced or brainwashed, or was it an inherent characteristic of the nation? Like John said, you are all forced, should Hitler alone be punished? The Germans' reflection on the war deserves our respect, as John finally figured out the meaning of this trial. It is no longer important who to punish and how to punish. What is needed is to tell the truth and let the whole nation and even human beings reflect.
View more about Labyrinth of Lies reviews
