The so-called romance movies are stories of men and women, so hereinafter referred to as "male" and "female".
After watching the movie, when someone drools and imagines that they can get the true love like in the movie, I feel conflicted, suddenly at a loss, and speechless. On the one hand, he is emotionally moved by the pure love described in the film; on the other hand, he strongly dislikes this unfair love.
I have doubts.
The cause was that the wrong button was pressed on PPS, and the movie started by accident. (Originally planned to watch "Frankenstein" =. =|||) The
film is describing true love; it is correcting values; it is promoting justice; it is analyzing human nature; it is creating dreams for us. The slutty sister finally got the evil results; the brother who changed from evil to righteous got eternal true love; the values of the virgin were further affirmed.
I will not repeat the analysis of these obvious central ideas. I would like to ask the following question, or a discussion question, because I don't know the answer.
As the film says, if a once slutty man can find true love, he can be accepted by women. Then I suppose, a once slutty woman finds true love, so how many men can accept it?
If a prostitute wants to live anew for the man she really loves, to be honest, modern technology such as hymen repair can achieve their superficial desire, but what will happen in reality? Regarding the result of this, women know in their hearts, whether they live a secret life for a lifetime, or be despised by the world; and 99% of men will reject such a woman, preferring to find a virgin who does not love, rather than a loving one. prostitute.
Why can women not hesitate in the face of love, and tolerate everything to the one they love, while men always have the so-called virgin complex? Why is "love" the first place for women, and "sex" is the most important for men?
The noble and precious virgins in the movies are actually based on the virgin complex of men. From this perspective, all romance films are shot for men.
Can you understand what this film wants to tell us like this: the past of a man is not important, as long as you can protect your ultimate true love of the woman; and no matter what the woman has to guard her body like a jade, if you can’t give yourself luck for the first time to love yourself The man who is right may not be happy or true love all his life, chaotic all his life.
In this way, can we further understand this: If a man can correct his moral values and values, he will definitely be able to get happiness; and even if there is no problem with morality, a woman must be "good luck" to get happiness.
In other words, a woman's happiness is a kind of luck on the establishment of a perfect hymen?
Of course, women's cleanliness is strongly advocated, but how valuable is loyalty? Protecting for a lifetime is for men, not for yourself; for a lifetime, can't you be 100% guaranteed to be happy? ! The only benefit is that you can feel at ease, have a social beauty appraisal, have contributed to the world's AIDS prevention, and made yourself healthy-such a perfect body, the result is protection for men? !
Women do not want to lead a slutty life, nor do they want to hand over the results of Joan to men.
For feelings, women are already tolerant enough, should men learn to be tolerant? If one day, the prostitutes who have been converted to the righteousness can get real happiness, and there may be no doubts.
However, if "returning evil to righteousness" can "disregard previous suspicions," the number of slutty women will surely multiply, and society will still be discordant. Conversely, thinking about it, men nowadays are in a world where they can “regulate evil and return to righteousness” so that they can fool around outside and regard visiting the red light district as a legitimate physical need; therefore, there will be more people who have no one. Wanted prostitutes, a vicious circle.
In this way, should women be more "pull"? I don’t want to be a virgin, I despise if I’m not a virgin, and even if I marry you, I will trouble you? Obviously this approach is vulgar and ineffective.
I am afraid that women will not be able to do this kind of rational behavior in thousands of years. After all, they are called "perceptual animals." No matter how hard they suffer, they will still put "love" and "love" first. This is true today, tomorrow, and it will continue to be true after thousands of years!
To put it bluntly, the above is only for complaining, and that's right.
View more about Cruel Intentions reviews
