read "Love and Elixir", which looked pretty good. The reason for the heroine in the film to break up with the protagonist is: "I need you more than you need me... It's not fair..." This line touched me, but then I thought, I love someone so much that I want that. To the extent that people live more freely, do you still want that person to fly away freely and then fly back? Even if that person doesn't come back, will he get the pleasure of self-sacrifice?
You can always see such a type of man or woman, these people will have this kind of thought: I love you so much, so I have the right to ask you to sacrifice for me. Is this kind of thought of their love? Such ugly "love" can actually make them indulge in self-movement...
When I was in college, I read through Sartre's brick-like book "Existence and Nothingness", but later I only thought about it. One sentence is very impressive: "The lover does not want to possess the loved one like people possess an object; he prays for a special type of self-possession. He wants to possess a freedom as freedom."
I saw this sentence at the time . There is a sudden sense of openness. It turns out that love just wants to possess "a freedom as freedom". I like this way of love.
Watching TV now, I often see that some costume dramas still intentionally or unintentionally instill a very decadent value, which is to materialize women's bodies. In addition, there are still many men with virgin complexes in China today, and they also subconsciously objectify women's bodies.
On the other hand, there are countless Chinese women who always want to restrict men’s freedom in exchange for a long marriage, and they may also subconsciously materialize men, that is, materialize them into long-term meals, money-making machines or withdrawals. Machines and such things.
Fortunately, in addition to these TV shows, we can also see movies like "Love and Elixir", and we can also see some romantic action movies.
This morning I was still thinking that when I was adolescent, the fleshy bodies in R-rated movies like "Love and Elixir" and more exciting love action movies had liberated my mind to some extent. They made me understand that even if their videos of messing with so many men are seen by countless people, they don't have to go to life, and they can still live a normal life, fall in love with others and even get married.
In other words, it is not that a woman has sex with a man, her body is equivalent to being "possessed".
In modern society, "possession" of someone else's body is a ridiculous and ignorant statement.
In modern society, no one has the right and right to "possess" the body of others.
The reason is simple. In modern society, our bodies are our own.
Before mankind entered modern society, the reason why the autocratic system worked was that those in power would instill in people such a theory that your body does not belong to you.
For example, if you were born in ancient China, you will be told: your body is not your own, your body belongs to the parents who gave birth to you, and the emperor is the father of all subjects, and those officials are also called "parent officials." (In modern society, the opposite is true, because taxpayers in modern society already understand that they are the food and clothing parents of the government and officials).
Why did Nezha commit suicide? He might just want to express such a meaning: Father, you said that my body was given by you, so well, I committed suicide! I will return my body to you! Is this all right?
And if Nezha is a modern person, then he can say to his father: You said you gave me my body? Do you have a problem with your brain? You let me come into this world, have you solicited my opinion? Before I am a minor, you can abandon me, but you have to bear the corresponding legal responsibilities.
Why did the emperors in the past always like to make so many precepts and prohibitions about sex? Because they want to control your body in this way, and they want to tell you in this way that your body does not belong to you. This way they can have the absolute right to dispose of your body-if you are a woman, they will fuck you if they want to. They don’t even bother to say “I shoot you innocent” because they will think they are You are worthy of you; and if you are a man, they will castrate you if they want to castrate you. If you are castrated, you have to "thank the Lord Longen". Of course, they may also be on you, and they don't care about your sexual orientation. Don't care if you want it or not.
Now you know why those writers and artists are desperately trying to produce works that are considered "vulgar", "degraded", and "indecent" by those in power? Because this is closely related to personal freedom-our body is our own, without hurting others, we make love and do things willingly with others, what right do you have to suddenly break into the door and take us away And put us in jail?
How free a country’s citizens can live is almost always proportional to the country’s sexual openness. And all the repression that the body endures stems from political repression. So don't underestimate or despise this "door" or that "door" created by the post-90s. Those "doors" can also promote the progress of the times to some extent.
View more about Love & Other Drugs reviews
