Science is a double-edged sword - playing with fire, Reivew on The Fly II

First, let's talk about science fiction. Not to mention the conversion device, pure science fiction. We should be familiar with the rest, that is, gene recombination and fusion (the first part), gene separation and selection (the second part). The famous "Alien" series is also based on genetic selection or DNA fusion.

Second, look at the release years of a few movies.
"Alien" 1-4, respectively 1979, 1986, 1992, 1997
"Fly Man" 1-2, respectively 1986, 1989
"Alien vs. Predator" 1-2, respectively 2004, 2007
"Human" "Beast Crossing", 2010
"Bollywood Robot Love", 2010
"Prometheus", 2012
Judging from the release year, the gene fusion "Fly Man" is early, "Alien" 1-3 is also It is only "parasitic", and it is "viviparous" when it reaches 4.
Others, such as gene mutation "Variant DNA", etc., drug genetic modification "Transparent Man", etc., mixed blood "Underworld", etc., human-machine splicing "Iron Armored Dragon", etc., science fiction concepts are different.

Finally, the love part personally feels a little weak or far-fetched. I was worried about whether the heroine would have a shadow after filming. Maybe the women at that time were more dedicated, or more professional and dedicated.

Earthlings have already built the atomic bomb. The cutting edge of technology must be secretly experimenting in unknown places. The only thing a movie can do is "demonstrate", "warning".

PS: I just watched the second part today.
The above personal views are for reference only.

View more about The Fly II reviews

The Fly II pictures