It's rare to see a movie today, in 1990. It was filmed based on the "communist monster" of the typhoon class. The film is full of the YY that the Soviet officials who are deeply oppressed by the totalitarian oppression longed for Satomi, which can be called Western-style fast food. However, there are many derivations in the details of this movie.
1. It was released in March 1990. This is the highlight of the whole film. From today's point of view, the animation and battle must be very low, but if you put it back to the 1990 timeline, it would be too shocking. . . A month later, Gaixnex began to broadcast the epic masterpiece "The Sapphire Mystery" on NHK. The submarine battle part in it. Before watching this movie, I can only admire the ruffian’s brains big enough for science fiction, but now I watched this movie, serious Suspect that he has learned something. . . Even the mechanical setting of Sadamoto Yoshiyuki has a shadow in this film. The submarine warfare part of this movie is actually not very good, but it is very likely that the "ancestor Gundam" of this theme has inspired many genres later.
2. There is a very interesting detail in the film. A senior government official said to a male pig: You know that I am a politician, and lying and deceiving are my old line of business, but at the same time, it also means that my thinking will not change. Will flexibly adjust my thinking based on what I understand. . . It can be regarded as a very good embellishment of the "main theme" of the whole film. A liberal democratic system is certainly not an absolutely perfect system, but it is a system that makes fewer mistakes. Why do some people step down under a democratic system and be replaced by voters? It is because the ruling individuals or groups made mistakes that caused dissatisfaction among the people. The philosophical premise of a democratic system is to assume that people will make mistakes. Is there a high probability that a person or system who believes that he will never make a mistake will make a mistake? Or do people and systems who admit that they will make mistakes and allow accountability to make mistakes are more likely to make mistakes? This little detail of frankly "liing into nature" is a very fascinating footnote to democratic philosophy.
3. The typhoon-class prototype can really represent the various signs of "communism", and the advantages and disadvantages of "concentrating power to do great things" are vividly demonstrated in it. . . It was established in the 1970s to deal with the Ohio class of the United States. The final displacement is almost 2.5 times that of its opponents, and it can carry more than 20 intercontinental nuclear missiles. . . The project template for fast-moving construction was established later than the opponent, but the completion time was almost the same, but the engineering volume was doubled. Isn't it familiar? The part we are most proud of today? The results of it? Violating the principle of applicability, it cannot survive like dinosaurs. Even if the Soviet Union does not collapse, it will not be able to support it if it continues to be consumed. It can even be said that the Soviet Union was dragged down by these proud things. "Underwater Hilton" and "Underwater Hilton" are Yamato. . . Lessons from previous mistakes are commonplace, but we can no longer awaken the group of people who are now obsessed with "system advantage."
4. The 1990s was an era of turmoil. The Berlin Wall fell in 1990, and the Soviet Union really collapsed in 1991. In many people's prospects, the red forces that represent totalitarianism have finally faded, and the future belongs to the "main theme" of the freedom of the dish. However, no one is perfect, and the democratic system, like any system, cannot be perfect. Is it going downhill? I don’t know. It is indeed exposing more and more problems. However, due to the vigorous and vigorous 2020, and sing praises for "concentrating power to do big things", thinking that democracy is dead end, this is a very dangerous thinking sign. Such signs have appeared in 1930, 1960, and 1989, and all signs indicate that we are returning to such a historical vortex. I hope I don't say anything.
On March 28, 2020, I felt it when the rain was about to come.
View more about The Hunt for Red October reviews
