It’s really bad if a movie wants to be popular. Tmd is not
easy to make a rough look at the comments on the homepage of the soybean oil: Alice is a superwoman and doesn’t respect the original game. . .
I feel dizzy. What are the thoughts? Sometimes people think about watching movies too bt (jumping thinking, not perverted, I am afraid that some soybean oil net blind do not understand, they are too tm want to put the word pervert on their heads. I hereby explain that old netizens can skip this sentence)
I also came from playing Biochemistry, and I didn’t play it. I didn’t respect the original game. For the issue of respecting the original game, I think the game was adapted from the beginning, but the main point The outline of the story and the biochemical plot are just that. Why should you stare at the game pinch? This is a game adapted movie. Please note: This is a game "adapted" movie, so you can't use the frame of the game plot. Restricting movies, if it were just a biochemical movie with a 3D picture turned into a real-life picture, and the plot is the same as a game, everyone would think it was good-looking? The
third plot has already begun to innovate and is not bad, because it is simple enough.
Hot and gorgeous action and gun battle, superb visual effects, simple plot, it completely got rid of the cumbersome plot of the second one, and I think the second one is the most unsightly. Sometimes commercial films don’t need anything right. Humanity, life, those more philosophical thinking,
sum up this movie with a one-sentence comment from "Horror Center":
endless thrilling action scenes, extraordinary visual effects, enough blood plasma to make you tremble... Episode 3 The film completely makes up for all the shortcomings of "Resident Evil 2: Revelation".
——"Horror Center"
View more about Resident Evil: Extinction reviews