Then there is the role of Reardon. In fact, when I first looked at the back, I thought that this role was not chosen well, because Reardon has a wide back. Anyway, it makes people feel like a very manly person, so It was only when I first saw the back figure that I wondered if the chosen character was not chosen properly. But in the back and Dagli xxoo, the back really looks good. It is said that the character he played is similar to the original, and this role is quite good.
Then we must mention another important role, Francisco d'Anconia. He disappointed me so much in this movie. In the original, Francisco de Anconia is very charming, okay? He is a playboy on the surface, but he is actually very principled. Even if he is a playboy on the surface, he is very manly. Wei is full of confidence and charm in his gestures, but this one in this movie is really a supporting role. If I ask him to make a magazine cover, I don't know what kind of expression to put on him. In the movie, his face The expression on the page is completely an idiot, okay? It doesn't make people show the charm of Francisco de Anconia in the original book. This character is very loving, okay? ! ! !
Then I want to talk about Hugh Agston, this character reminds me of the word "elegant" in the novel. You said let me talk about a refined Chinese man, maybe I will know what it looks like, but in a foreign man, I really don't know how to show "refinement". Fortunately, Hugh Argus in this movie It only appeared for dozens of seconds, otherwise I was really afraid that he would make me disillusioned. After all, this character is still a bit of a fairy. The white suit worn in the movie is in line with the original book, but the figure makes people feel too realistic. I really wish I could choose a more handsome one.
Finally, let's talk about Reardon's wife, she's really not flattering. I think it should be a more gentle-looking woman, but she is full of dissatisfaction with her husband, but in the movie. . . . . . . The fact that this woman looks a bit sturdy, at least made me feel the same dislike as the original book, so it still "conforms" to the original book.
In the end, I really want to talk about the director. How can this story be expressed in this way? I can't see the original flavor in the novel at all. It also doesn't make people very passionate. I read the novel for the first time, but after a while, I read it for the second time, okay? I hope the movie can at least give me a sense of Ayn Rand's intentions, so that I don't have to read it a third time, and it's not bad to watch the movie, but obviously this movie let me down
View more about Atlas Shrugged: Part I reviews
