"Death on the Run" was a success, following the usual American film pattern, with a second and third installment, albeit only on DVD. As a remake of the old movie "Death Speed", the two sequels that have been launched in succession seem a bit different. It is obviously a make-up plot. Although the background of 1 is explained as self-evidently as possible, but unfortunately the director's skill is not enough, how do these two prequels look like "TV movies", and their shooting methods are the same as ordinary American dramas. . However, the director still followed the routine of 1 in the second part steadily (or copied it), and in the third part, it seemed a bit nonsense. I won't complain about photography, editing, etc. (I don't understand), the plot of this one is much worse than the previous one. If the male protagonist hadn't come after Jason Statham, maybe my evaluation of these two prequels would have been higher. However, Luke Gauss is also a real hard-core star in Hollywood, and he handles action scenes more solidly than Jason Statham. The most unbearable part of the third part is that Carl arranged such a happy ending, and in the end, the rich and handsome consortium boss actually turned into Frankstein himself, which is really incomprehensible. A deceased "transparent person" escaped by relying on the mercy of the former boss. Although this ending is gratifying, it can be said that there is no logical foothold. If a mighty conglomerate who can arbitrarily acquire the world's most popular sports has only such a small ability, then the mask diaosi really has had shit luck. In my opinion, the explanation of the second part is just right, Frankenstein has been produced, and the changes in the middle can be explained, but there is no need to let the wicked be punished, and it is enough to give Karl a super-perfect ending. Luxurious enough. As for Frankenstein, the disfigured boss could have someone else make a cameo.
View more about Death Race: Inferno reviews
