Another edition of "Shawshank's Redemption"-What is justice?

Mylene 2021-11-24 08:01:17

Looking at this film, in general: nervousness, moving, and more reflection. Let's talk about tension + reflection. As far as the plot itself is concerned, since he tried the legal way to despair and started to do that "key knocking", it became very heart-puzzling and exciting. It is not like the American blockbuster we are familiar with. Prison escape must be earth-shattering. The protagonist must be three-headed and six-armed. He is just an ordinary person like us, gentle and introverted, in line with ordinary people's psychology. This is a big idea. Some studies say that the IQ of the Chinese is comparable to that of the Jews, and they are one of the nations with the highest IQ in the world. And the old beauty sounded like the big bosses with well-developed limbs and simple minds. However, let alone the economy and technology created by Americans over the past 200 years, as far as movies are concerned, in terms of conception, conception, dialogue, and images, they are indeed beyond the reach of the Chinese. At least not for now. So, everyone think about it, where is our wisdom used? I think a large part of it is used in how to rectify people, and how to prevent people and rectify people. Let's talk about moving + reflection. I heard a joke: In the United States, a classmate’s new semester, the teacher did a survey and asked children whose parents were not divorced to raise their hands. As a result, no one raised their hands because he felt inferior. In the knowledge we have received before, the United States is a society of open sex, violence, indifference, and racial discrimination. Men and women are casual, and marriage and divorce are common. However, I have seen many beautiful films, including this one: between husband and wife, between elders, between fathers, between friends, and so on. American families are not as lively as the Chinese. On the premise of maintaining individual independence, they also have responsibility and warmth, and have a family-run philosophy. It's just that the Chinese are more traditionally based, while the Americans are based on human nature and ethics. The Chinese like to get together, but they are never united. Is this a sign of our lack of self-confidence? Does independence mean indifference? It's worth thinking about. Regarding whether Americans are sexually open or even promiscuous, I recently watched Phoenix TV commentators comment on the IMF President: Frenchman Kahn’s sexual harassment case, which gave me a completely different view. He said: "If this happened in France, it would be a trivial matter, because it is normal for the French to think that men are lustful, and French public opinion almost never reports on the private lives of politicians. But if it happens in the United States, it is a trivial matter. This is a very important event, because the United States is a very conservative society, like the Clinton incident, etc... "The United States is actually a very conservative society? I haven't been there. I don't know. But I think we need to put a question mark at least on the understanding of the United States. Of course, what makes me sigh and touch is the American social consciousness. , Legal awareness, civic awareness, and the police. Although the containment failed, their dedication and responsibility are something that any Chinese in our society cannot expect or even imagine. Then, in my opinion, this It is another version of "Shawshank's Redemption." The two dramas have the same effect: that is, although the Americans did not give us the answer to the question of "what is justice," it can be seen that they have been thinking about it. At the same time, it also leaves us with a lot of thinking. The difference between this film and "Xiao" is that "Xiao" is more about enhancing human nature, antagonizing and demonizing society and government. However, this film is pursuing law and justice. Maximize. But "what is justice? This film seems to be affirming a crime, and the male number one did commit a crime, but why every one of us feels that his actions are more like justice when we watch it, but the police are more like villains-if not three On the rainy day after the year. The ending is indeed the finishing touch, making us feel that they are actually not wrong. This is smart! Indeed, each of us is also a member of this society. As long as there are humans, there will be crime and injustice, as long as there are people, there will be private thoughts. What exactly is justice? No one knows the answer. But what is certain is that the law: the only tool that human society can guarantee fairness and justice at present, the Americans have taken it to the extreme. Although in the end, when the button fell from the edge of the sewer cover, the truth and justice disappeared forever. But just when everyone regrets that the truth has disappeared, and when they hate the worrying screenwriter for not restoring the truth to the person involved, the truth has not disappeared, because it remains in the heart of every judge. Then, in my opinion, this is another edition of Shawshank's Redemption. The two dramas have similarities in the same way: that is, although the Americans did not give us the answer to the question of "what is justice," it can be seen that they have been thinking about it, and at the same time they have left us with a lot of thinking. What makes this film different from "Xiao" is. "Shaw" has enhanced human nature more, and antagonized and vilified society and government. But this film is pursuing the maximization of law and justice. However, "What is justice? This film seems to affirm a crime, and the male number one did commit a crime, but why every one of us feels that his actions are more like justice when we watch it, but the police are more like it? It's the villain-if it wasn't for the rainy day three years later. The ending is indeed the finishing touch, which makes us feel that they are not wrong. This is clever! Indeed, each of us is also a part of this society. As long as there are humans, there will be crimes and injustices, as long as people will have private thoughts. What is justice? No one knows the answer. But what is certain is that the law: this current human society can guarantee fairness The only tool of justice, the Americans took it to the extreme. Although in the end the button fell from the sewer cover, truth and justice disappeared forever. But when everyone regrets the disappearance of the truth, When I hate the heart-wrenching screenwriter for not restoring the truth to the person involved, the truth has not disappeared, because it remains in the heart of every judge. Then, in my opinion, this is another edition of Shawshank's Redemption. The two dramas have similarities in the same way: that is, although the Americans did not give us the answer to the question of "what is justice," it can be seen that they have been thinking about it, and at the same time they have left us with a lot of thinking. What makes this film different from "Xiao" is. "Shaw" has enhanced human nature more, and antagonized and vilified society and government. But this film is pursuing the maximization of law and justice. However, "What is justice? This film seems to affirm a crime, and the male number one did commit a crime, but why every one of us feels that his actions are more like justice when we watch it, but the police are more like it? It's the villain-if it wasn't for the rainy day three years later. The ending is indeed the finishing touch, which makes us feel that they are not wrong. This is clever! Indeed, each of us is also a part of this society. As long as there are humans, there will be crimes and injustices, as long as there are people, there will be private thoughts. What is justice? No one knows the answer. But what is certain is that the law: this current human society can guarantee fairness The only tool of justice, the Americans took it to the extreme. Although in the end the button fell from the sewer cover, truth and justice disappeared forever. But when everyone regrets the disappearance of the truth, When I hate the heart-wrenching screenwriter for not restoring the truth to the person involved, the truth has not disappeared, because it remains in the heart of every judge. Although in the end, when the button fell from the edge of the sewer cover, the truth and justice disappeared forever. But just when everyone regrets that the truth has disappeared, and when they hate the worrying screenwriter for not restoring the truth to the person involved, the truth has not disappeared, because it remains in the heart of every judge. Although in the end, when the button fell from the edge of the sewer cover, the truth and justice disappeared forever. But just when everyone regrets that the truth has disappeared, and when they hate the worrying screenwriter for not restoring the truth to the person involved, the truth has not disappeared, because it remains in the heart of every judge.

View more about The Next Three Days reviews

Extended Reading

The Next Three Days quotes

  • [first lines]

    David: Please, get me to a hospital. I can't breathe. I...

  • Erit: Don't apologize, it's genetics. Women are always competing with each other. That's why you're having problems with your boss.

    Lara Brennan: Because she's a woman...

    Erit: Exactly. Women should work under men, men under women. That's it.

    John Brennan: What about men under men?

    Erit: That's fine too, I mean they can deal with it.