I think some people will complain that the narrative method of this film is a little loose after watching it, but this is in line with the core of the film's story. The occurrence of one thing, no matter how big or small, will cause a ripple reaction like water waves between seemingly loose people. As a result, their fate was pushed into an unpredictable direction.
In this film, this ripple effect is shown in the ups and downs of the fortunes of various stakeholders after a detective is killed. Jack's tragic fate lingers like a demon from the start.
Jack's "egg" was smashed by the brother of Lucia, a woman he had a crush on when he was a child. This heinous tragedy made people wonder how this big strong man completed the development of secondary sexual characteristics. When you see You seem to understand something when they secretly inject cows with hormones to make them grow stronger in a short period of time. This man officially relies on these hormones to complete his growth and maintain his life.
This kind of "hormone-fighting" episode, which violates the food supervision regulations, happens to the people and cows in the same movie. The humorous, bitter, helpless, and absurd in this film is more or less embarrassing and then thinks of something.
When Jack delivered the cow and pulled out the cowboy from the belly of the cow, the next shot was the warm picture of the family of the younger brother. The hints and explanations of this place give Jack and the audience a rather sad feeling on a unified spiritual level. This kind of sadness is the continuation of Jack's childhood nightmare and the revelation of Jack's ultimate fate.
There are three parts of the film that involve homosexuality: The first part is just a clip. When Jack's mother learned that her son needs hormones to complete his development, the first question turned out to be "Will he become gay?" This kind of idiot question, Maybe the screenwriter is intentionally showing the ignorance of the locals about homosexuality; the second part, as the plot develops, gradually explained that the informant (also Jack's childhood playmate) and the male police detective first ambiguously passed on to The relationship between the audience and the audience does not seem to be simple. In the end, they directly tell the audience about their same-sex relationship through "kissing"; the third part is just a fragment. When Jack feels that his existence is like those cows, he doesn't know how When protecting a person, the informant hugged Jack to comfort him. At this time, Jack seemed to feel something and asked the informant directly, "Aren't you gay?". So in general, the content of homosexuality in the film is actually not too small, but it is really unknown why the content of homosexuality is included in this film. At present, it is impossible to interpret the contribution of homosexuality to the theme of the film. . Could it be that the screenwriter is making a joke that "the one who has eggs becomes gay, and the one who doesn't have eggs sticks to a woman for 20 years"?
Matthias Schoenaert's performance in the film is unforgettable. His figure is undoubtedly strong, for which he has spent two years of exercise preparation, and the director shows his figure again and again without hesitation. You may suspect that this is "selling meat", but when you think about it Jack's figure in the movie is actually produced by hormones. Under his strong appearance, he is actually a hopeless, lonely, lonely, and inferior heart maintained by hormones, you will think this should be sexy. The figure is the first intuitive reason for his sympathy. Matthias Schoenaier's eyes and expressions in the film are extremely in place to tell the audience about Jack's complex emotions and moods, which are not hideous but thrilling.
This is not just a story of "broken eggs" (note that it is not "broken eggs"), but a story of "fate", "love", "friendship", "hate", "homosexuality" and so on. Keyword's melancholy and desperately slowly walking towards you bull.
View more about Rundskop reviews
