The times make heroes war is always bloody

Grace 2022-03-19 08:01:02

First of all, I don't want anyone to feel the same way, but I have to say that war always makes my blood flow, like every time I think about natural born killers, my pores stand up all over!


Foreword:
I don't understand why so few people are interested in war itself. I don't support the Nazis and I don't appreciate aggression, but Hitler himself was a genius, whether it was a speech genius or a crappy but vain soldier, he got what he wanted in a shameless but self-respecting way thing. This attitude and approach may be worth learning

from, but you may not agree with me. But please listen to me.

No matter whether you are a war history lover or not, it is difficult for you to ignore such a character who has written a strong history in history. He was a child of an artist who was abused as an illusion, and when he grew up, he opened his mouth to ask for milk (asking for credit). Soldiers, but to understand the history of World War II and the transitional relationship between Germany and Germany from World War I to World War II, you must be clear about the world situation at that time and the national conditions of Germany.

First of all, the Versailles contract left over after the First World War must admit that as a defeated country and its nation, there must be an unwillingness to admit defeat and be unwilling. Empathy, huge compensation, exploitation by various victorious countries, contradictions within the nation, post-war economic depression. Unemployment soaring, people losing their sense of existence, inflationary pressures, etc. etc., Germans, no, Germans are looking for their place, in Germany, in Berlin, and in the world. They intended to take a breather, especially for a nation that considered itself noble by nature. They fervently longed for pure Germanism, for the re-emergence of the Germans, for the revival of the Aryans. At this time, Hitler appeared, yes, he appeared in time, you have to admit the inevitability of history. Even without him, someone else would have led the Germans to a world uprising.

The predecessor of the German Workers' Party was exactly where Hitler lived, where he found his sense of belonging and existence. He was not necessarily a gifted speaker, but he knew how to show off and attract attention.

Before watching this movie, I personally suggest to refer to some Hitler's life and historical facts, so that you can understand some details of the director's ulterior motives, but can't let you understand in a limited time. ——Hitler, was an extreme nationalist, which has been highlighted in the film; Hitler was a poor artist, although he did nothing but he was willing to try; Hitler was a shameless man, facing the same war and a dog, he You can swear one second before, but praise in disguise the next second, he is a second-skinned man. But, there's also Hitler you don't know.

His serious continental territory and even the whole world should be ruled by pure Germans. He looks down on the British, French, and even the United States, a multi-ethnic "historyless" and impure political system and existence.

Hitler has several details that can be attributed to his unique oratory talent, which can also be called unique oratory skills. He enjoys making his own roar in front of the public. He carefully rehearses his speech gestures and body language. He always waits a long time to get on the stage after the applause. Ken gives the final shot the final climax.



On the other hand, this is not a purely German film, and I don't believe Germans are willing to insult themselves like this. The face of the tough guy in the American drama that appears in the play makes people laugh and cry, but this is the reality. This is a traditional European and American-style blockbuster. It uses its own political background to try to understand the birth of Germany and Hitler at that time, such as warlords, puppets, think tanks, and consortia. Thinking about the current American elections, isn’t it still the same routine? This is also an inevitable stage for the birth of a political party, a party, and a new provisional government. No one will make a revolution without the support of a consortium, the people, and warlords. , this is simply putting yourself together.



Hitler was a child. When his wishes failed, Hitler was a cold-blooded man. When his background would hinder his career, Hitler was a man of quick success. When he found that he could get support in front of the consortium— —Extremely nationalistic overtones, coupled with the frustration of getting nothing done as a child, yes! He finally found his stage!


The birth of Hitler is of great historical inevitability. As mentioned above, combined with the national conditions and historical background of Germany after World War I, it is not difficult for you to draw this conclusion. But Hitler is irreplaceable, and it is because of his military expedition, extermination of Jews, his crazy nationalism, and the re-emergence of Germany that he attracted so many armies, political parties, and people to join in.


Another example is Rommel, the desert fox. Rommel did not like the aggression itself, but he saw the hope of the rise of Germany in Hitler. You cannot say that Rommel followed blindly, because at that time, Hitler only mentioned resistance but not dictatorship + aggression. Even after World War II, he still did not use the word aggression, in his concepts, in his speeches, in the ideas he instilled in the Germans, everything was just fighting for the poor Germans. some living space.



At the same time, the warlords, after all, are military generals. They longed for the world to recreate an iron-blooded Bismarck, longed for revenge against the British and French, and longed for the days when the army stopped doing nothing, so they also discovered Hitler. This is the perfect connection between the market and demand! If you want to buy an IP, I happen to have it, so you don't have to queue up to grab it! Live!




This movie has to admit that it is as close to the historical facts as possible, but neither you nor me, including the director, have any way of knowing what the real Hitler looked like. Therefore, I can only say that he is as close as possible, but not perfect in form and expression. Because in the end, he was still mixed with a large stream of consciousness, because when Hitler was supposed to be speaking to the people in the most rigorous language in the world, it turned into broken English. This in itself is a failure.

View more about Hitler: The Rise of Evil reviews

Extended Reading

Hitler: The Rise of Evil quotes

  • Adolf Hitler: If a thief takes your money and you take it back, does that make you also a thief?

  • Adolf Hitler: Pride is a weapon!