"The law is above everything, but what happens when people's state of mind is above the law?"
Maybe for some people, although the new version expands the breadth, it does not In depth, there is some concern for this and the other.
Personally, I think it is a work that is better than blue. The very theatrical script and performance, through Nikita Mikhalkov's three-in-one narration and constantly changing lens settings bring the film's sense of purity. . Not only does the old version take humanity as the center, but also expands to human nature as the center, but also contains discussions on politics, race, family, redemption and self-salvation, repentance and hope, etc. In addition, the changes in key plots make the film full of richness. humanistic care.
Except that I personally think it is straightforward to let the bird fly out in the end. Although it is its own choice, it has a certain effect on the atmosphere. It's snowing heavily outside, how about flying out tomorrow? Unlike the youth in the film, they are passive, and there are only two extremes to choose from. Therefore, I think that this kind of setting makes people feel that the bird is still passively handled by the director.
2008-01-05
View more about 12 reviews
