limited freedom

Dannie 2022-03-25 08:01:02

The questions raised in this film are good and the approach is sufficiently oriented, but I still cannot be persuaded to support the continuation of the doctrine.

Creationism has always been a helpless move in my eyes. People are not satisfied and ignorant about things that cannot be explained, and they can only weave a whole system to make up for it. In modern society, people find that system cannot explain everything, so there is fundamentalism: the Bible is unverifiable and unquestionable. Isn't this another kind of oppression? In 1925, Scopes, a middle school teacher in Detton City, Tennessee, taught Darwin's theory of evolution to his students, and he was accused by fundamentalist church members. Fundamentalists forced a court to convict Scopes of violating state laws, and Scopes was forced to leave school.

The development of modern science has explained many things that could not be explained before, but there are still things that cannot be explained. Is it too lazy to throw the problem to God at this time?

The so-called freedom of research, I think the government's concern is definitely not that the research of creationism has reached the point of overthrowing the theory of evolution. Maybe it is to save time for scholars, maybe it is to kill chickens and monkeys with harsh means, maybe it is to not incite the general public with less discerning ability. The merging of a country with so much science and a country with so much Christianity really makes it difficult for academia and government.

View more about Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed reviews

Extended Reading
  • Fabian 2022-03-27 09:01:23

    Poorly made propoganda. This film commits a number of documentary film making sins! This film is a perfect example of how not to do a documentary.

  • Misty 2022-03-25 09:01:23

    Nothing is absolute!

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed quotes

  • Ben Stein: What if after you died you ran into God, and he says, what have you been doing, Richard? I mean what have you been doing? I've been trying to be nice to you. I gave you a multi-million dollar paycheck, over and over again with your book, and look what you did.

    Richard Dawkins: Bertrand Russell had that point put to him, and he said something like: sir, why did you take such pains to hide yourself?

    Ben Stein: [voice over] But, if the Intelligent Design people are right, he isn't hidden. We may even be able to encounter God through science, if we have the freedom to go there. What could be more intriguing than that?

  • David Berlinski: Suppose we find, simply as a matter of fact, that our scientific inquiries point in one direction: a creator. Why should we eliminate that from discussion? 'Strang verboten'? How come? Why?