There are a lot of people who mentioned that the shots of this film are not so exciting, and I don't really agree. Most of the shots in the movie are in motion, and even at home, the camera moves slowly sideways. That's why the movie doesn't seem boring at all. The other movement is through the content of the screen. The movement of people, the movement of cars... In short, the movement in the picture is everywhere. The exception is when the heroine and cafe friends bask in the sun... Finally jumping to the big vision, the wind and sand swept through the desolate town, and the two women basked in the sun in the middle of the road. This is definitely the director's interest...
Obviously new Hollywood style, I can't help but think of "Easy Rider", I can't tell what it looks like.
The biggest influence this movie has on me is about how to be "like a movie". I often talk to my friends about XX movies that look like TV series... How can they look like movies? I think the key is exercise. Whether it's camera movement or character movement... it's always in a dynamic. This will always catch the audience's eyes and hold them firmly on their chairs.
PS: Another kind of movement is heartbeat. People such as Ozu and Yang Dechang use the space outside the painting to form a composition with a sense of lack on the screen, and then this idea of what is missing in the picture (usually a person) leads people to think about what is wrong (what about people?) ? what happened?
View more about Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore reviews
