In the movie, as the writer's male protagonist, he invented a theory that if the imitation can achieve the effect of the original, it will be no different from the original. So the heroine, who has never tasted her life, used an example to refute the writer's concept. What she wants to prove is that life and imitation are completely different.
Since the two of them are considered husband and wife by many, the heroine simply takes on the role of wife, assuming it is their fifteenth wedding anniversary, and returns to the hotel room where they were married. The female protagonist can play well, but the male protagonist cannot.
What does all this mean? My superficial understanding is that life itself cannot be replicated, and it is also worth cherishing.
View more about Certified Copy reviews
