The stalks are left over by others. The newcomer and the veteran fought for favor, and they were both left home. With the help of the friends, they returned to their hometown and reconciled. This is the first part of "Toy Story". The third part. In light of the plot, it feels like watching an animal version of "Toy Story" with bugs.
Of course, the trailer has already announced the world-what is the plot to eat? So the plot is not important, the bridge is not afraid of the old, just don't use the splits.
Art and imagination are a hundred years behind the Minions. Anyway, a dog is like a dog, and a cat is like a cat. Dogs and cats should have a brain made up for the ten pet owners in a small theater like a party when the owner is away. Everyone is still good friends without mentioning "creativity".
The selling point and watching point of this cartoon is "Moe". It's shameful to be cute. But what is self-esteem? Just sell it for money. The target audience of this film feels that killing will die and screams "Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh". Willing to fight and suffer, very good.
People who are too cute like me can only watch the whole process indifferently. But from the beginning, I knew that I was not in the target audience group. It was boring to watch this film. It makes no sense for a person who only drinks Coca-Cola to go to KFC to order a meal with Coke and then dislike Pepsi. So when I came back, I was asked and just said "okay."
I also looked back at the acquaintance, slapped me and said, "There are little friends in the hall. The ending is a bit scary."
She has no beginnings and ends, but I understand. The ending-this is not a spoiler, the family carnival cartoons are all reunion-all pets have returned to their "owners" (the pet owner is referred to as the owner in the movie, which is the same as the "owner" of the slave owner" The embrace of the word), a scene of great love and joy in the world, it’s quite terrifying.
Pets love its owner-this is entirely human self-centered wishful thinking.
"Love" is an active and dynamic emotion (unlike "fear" and "anger" and other stressful emotions), so the first to be able to "love" is to have self-awareness.
Individual animals have self-awareness, such as killer whales and elephants. The more self-conscious an animal is, the harder it is to tame (taming elephants is an animalless process). Even if they are tamed, these self-aware animals will not fall in love with you just because you feed them and bathe them every day. Just like an intelligent and sound human being will not love you just because you lock up Yi and feed Yi every day and give Yi a bath. This is a truth.
If this human being imprisoned and domesticated by you finally depends on your unwillingness to leave or even weeping because of your death, it is called "Stockholm Syndrome." An animal with intact self-awareness will not love anyone because of who cares about Yi and raises Yi. But, you see, if I say in front of any pet owner that your dog loves the old king next door, the other person must think that the one who is crazy is me.
Therefore, every time I hear a dog owner or a cat owner say "my family xxx loves me so much", I meditate on whether you don't understand love at all, or you don't understand animals at all, or you are wearing a king. 'S new clothes deceived themselves and played too high. But as long as I don't force me to agree with your dog, I love you. It's absolutely impossible to fall in love with the old king next door.
Anyway, pet cats and dogs are created by human beings who lack love in the five elements to project the loneliness, emptiness and coldness that has nowhere to vent. To nature, they are all scientific monsters. It doesn't matter to me whether you treat them as playthings or as sons.
I care about that falcon.
The falcon is a bird of prey. It is not bad or evil to eat small animals. It is made by nature. Both "Madagascar" and "Ice Age" will inevitably force carnivores to abandon their natural food habits. Only predators who do not eat (red) meat can be "kind". This set of strange truths imposed on nature by humans is right and counted as The historical problems and practical difficulties of cartoons, even the "Crazy Zoo" that speaks for the carnivores just sets a more reasonable background for the lion not to eat the white rabbits.
However, whether human beings imprison natural predators such as falcons, crocodiles, and snakes in cities based on their emotional needs of extreme lack of love or the strange psychological compensation of weak dicks, it is not worth promoting or beautifying in any case.
Don't kill and set fire in the name of love.
Boiling an eagle is a mournful thing for the eagle. Whoever has searched will know. And the human self-centered consciousness in this film has really expanded to horrific. The crocodile avoided the terrible little girl, which was good. According to my thoughts, the falcon should be free to return to the blue sky in the end. As a result, it automatically returned to the arms of the eagle man, with a satisfied expression of "I just went out and wandered, and in the end I still love my owner". It's terrible.
Any animal, as long as you like it, can be caught and domesticated; as long as you love them in the process of domestication (I will not guess what kind of love it is), you will not leave them and let them go, they will be certain in the end. I will love you and live a happy and boundless life in the reinforced concrete jungle. Those who have been taught since childhood and believe in this kind of truth should stay as far away as possible.
View more about The Secret Life of Pets reviews
