watched this film by Haynes in 1995 in the film elective course. From beginning to end, the progress is slow, the texture of the picture is cool, the lines and Zhu Zhu have no waves. Miss Lianne Moore's seemingly unreal allergy symptoms are all I have of the film. So I'm giving a "OK" rating not because I really think the movie is OK, but because it's really beyond what I can evaluate and leaves me with no choice.
There are pitifully few comments on the film on the Internet, and all the comments "borrow" from nowhere. They all have a common comment on the film: the most politically significant allegory film in the post-AIDS era. Forgive me for being superficial, I didn't see such a profound proposition from this film, but after discussing it with my friends after class, I felt that rather than being so obscure and difficult to understand, the root cause of the heroine's illness was the leisurely and boring life sentence of the middle class. Having said that, I thought of the rich Yikusitian in "Party A and Party B" who was so tired of eating lobsters and dreamed of living a hard life for two days. It is also a state of being full and supporting. Why are the Chinese people and the American people so different?
If there are experts who can see the clue, please enlighten me~
PS: Haynes, you actually shot the velvet gold mine?
View more about Safe reviews