When I first watched the movie, I judged that the plot must have succeeded in stealing it, but then it is impossible to stop it . I
have to explain the ending. How does the conflict between human feelings and secular law end?
I didn't expect it to end like this, it's just flouting the law.
Stealing books can't be counted as stealing books... Stealing books! ...the matter of the scholar, can it be considered stealing? In the same way, all lovers of literature and art
in this movie can follow the same method, a person who is competent in physical work and psychological quality, a relevant professional understanding, and a security guard who can control the video. What else can you say you can't steal? I also noticed that none of the three artworks are modern. The whole movie handled very lightly and humorously. The three old actors have nothing to say, but people who don't feel the artwork don't know if they can understand the infatuation of the three by looking at the call. , Fortunately, no one does not like a relative like a wife. It is better to cherish the living than to cherish the dead? The more ordinary the more worth having? Brother, it's not the real thing, is it a feeling? People who watch lonely girls are not lonely, right?
View more about The Maiden Heist reviews