shabby_LoukasTC
statement: Any remarks I make below have nothing to do with the original, because I have not read the original, only for the movie, no matter whether the original and the movie are completely consistent or slightly modified, I The comments have nothing to do with the original.
----------------------------
Ok! Tell me it's not true! Known as the "Encyclopedia of Love," this much-anticipated and highly anticipated classic love story left me so speechless. I hardly know what words to use to describe my mood and feelings. I just feel that this love is not worthy of my grand expectations. I just want to say: the love that has been waiting for half a century is so shabby.
First of all, the encounter between the hero and heroine can be said to be unbearable, but two lonely souls are attached to two young men and women who are not very good looking, and then at an age when dry wood meets fire, they wipe out an inexplicable love. spark. Then the two of them started to exchange letters that they thought were true love, which almost killed them and made life and death like separation, but what love story between a rich family lady and a poor boy is not like this? And the heroine after the return did show the expected escape, because whether in theory or in reality, it is impossible for her to love this poor boy to the bone, but it was a random encounter, plus a few wild geese What is the reason for the death of the relationship! What is rare is that the male protagonist can actually complete this fantasy love as a lifelong ambition, which is an unforgettable memorial. He didn't fall in love with the heroine at all, he fell in love with the feeling of being persistent and loyal to one person. Because of his lascivious and neurotic fantasies, he must find an image for his soul to live in, and this image is the heroine, which is good, and shows that he is very loyal and unswerving to death. Speaking of which, who can love someone for fifty years, how great! FML!
The one I deplore the most is the heroine's husband. This man has an extraordinary temperament as soon as he appears, let alone looks a little like Johnny Depp, so I gave him infinite sympathy and stance points. The movie arranged a derailment for him, which seemed to shake his position in the hearts of the audience, but on the contrary. I watched the whole movie and the only thing that is 100% sure is that he is the only one who truly and wholeheartedly loves the heroine. Even though he was forcibly arranged to cheat once, he still loved the heroine to the death. As his last words said, only God knows how much he loves her. In the whole film, I only shed a single tear in the opening scene when my elderly husband climbed a ladder and fell, lying in the arms of the heroine and uttering the last touching line. Nothing else really impresses me. Not to mention that shabby half-century love.
Also, the heroine had a "gentleman" dialogue with him on the hero's boat, describing how her marriage over the past 50 years was actually nothing more than gold and jade. A source of failure and disappointment. Really shameless. As soon as her husband died, he immediately threw himself into the arms of his old lover, and slandered this 50-year silent love with such vicious remarks. Especially to an equally shameless promiscuous man. Even the Titanic that sank to the bottom of the sea, if it hadn't sunk, the married life of rose and jack would not have been much better, but it was a helpless version of the poor and humble couple's sorrow. Which couple can go through fifty years of marriage without a bit of precariousness. Seven years is a hurdle. You both supported each other and walked through seven and a half hurdles together, and you can slander this relationship with such a blushing face and a heartbeat, isn't it? What is shameless! I'm stumped that you chose that telegraph guy in the first place, will your future life be happy and harmonious? More ignorant than shameless. Sure enough, she is a woman who has never been saddened by the economy all her life.
There are also male and female protagonists, please, since they are unparalleled in love, let's find two peers who are peerless to play. The appearance of these two people is too unsatisfactory. Having said that, the heroine's husband is more likable.
The male protagonist repeatedly emphasized in it that falling in love with the female protagonist is the fate of his life. I want to say, please don't distort love casually, okay? Yes, everyone has different views and understandings of love, but this does not mean that the male protagonist can play the audience unscrupulously in front of all the audience. Don't think that you love the heroine because you never married and always say the heroine's name; don't think that every time you stare at the heroine like a wretched voyeur and stalker, you are obsessed. Your image is really the same as your heart, an ugly man with a hunched back. It's hard to imagine how he could have slept with at least 622 women. Are these women blind?
Finally, I give three stars to the heroine's deceased husband, I hope he will open his eyes in the next life and find a person who truly loves to marry.
View more about Love in the Time of Cholera reviews
