, and the evaluation of the film by the brothers and sisters who played the film seriously deviated from what I thought,
so I couldn’t say anything at that time. After I
got home, I
simply sorted out my thoughts and
watched the film
. The focus is on the conviction in the second half of the film. The helplessness, vulnerability and repentance that Jacques showed when
he learned that he would be hanged is indeed sympathetic and shocking , but we cannot ignore the first half of the film because of the shock of the second half. The director's foreshadowing The three clues of the film The lawyer part I won't talk about the slain driver's pleas for the murderer before his death. Being as helpless as a child makes it difficult for me to put the cold-blooded driver who is full of contempt and banter on everything around him. There is a Chinese saying that people who are about to die are also good at their words, including the struggle of the murderer before leaving. Jacques told his defense lawyer that his experience a few years ago was the most vulnerable and sensitive part of him. Unreservedly presented it was interesting that we watched the movie with a foreign friend who later said that he did not understand Polish fast reading level and did not make him understand some subtitles he only saw what he saw That's someone who kills someone and then gets the punishment they deserve. Maybe we're so focused on the murderer's story that we deviate from what the director is trying to say
It has already started to run counter to the original intention of the director.
It is precisely because the world is not so clear-cut as
black and white, and there are some very subtle elements between black and white, that
a law like the death penalty is needed to "relentlessly" define this boundary
. Perhaps this is the rule of law society compared to the rule of man. That part of society that is more civilized
The world exists objectively,
not a utopia imagined in someone's mind.
Therefore, there are only one set of standards and
two sets of standards. There is no standard.
Without standards, this injustice in society can only be exacerbated
. Before you met a rapist
, you thought he was so damn damn
good, but when you saw the way he was in prison and it was better to die,
you felt sympathy
, and you even questioned that such a person must have his own reasons for committing crimes.
You began to question In addition, is the punishment on him too cruel ? But you
haven't contacted the person who was raped by him.
Maybe it was because of that encounter that
her whole life was trampled.
Seeing
Jacques is the same.
A few years ago, the carelessness led to the abyss of loneliness and helplessness.
But from another angle, think about
him.
People who have choices have choices.
You can choose one
that is more positive in popular terms. Living in
this way,
oneself , including many others, can be protected from harm
. If we do not even have the least judgment,
it is difficult to say that such a person is suitable for this society.
If you question the necessity of the death penalty
then is it appropriate that someone (forgot the name..) was sentenced to 130 years in prison
?
Perhaps this is the more cruel and inhumane
crime. There is always a corresponding way of atonement. The
people in the game understand this truth
, so when the murderer loses in court, it is an acceptance that
he does not struggle . Maybe that's more than what this film discusses. I'm just talking about my thoughts on the discussion after the film that day.
View more about A Short Film About Killing reviews
