total exploitation of people

Claudine 2022-09-19 02:50:10

People used to belong to capital in form, because technology, resources, and organization were all crude, and they needed "skilled craftsmen" and "skilled people". Therefore, capital owners are still very disciplined and talk about "morality", so the bottom line Only those who sell labor can form associations and form strength.

Since steam, internal combustion engines, generators, electric motors, nuclear energy, and the Internet have gradually become mainstream, people are not people, but the parts that maintain the operation of capital. Therefore, the financial industry, which is highly dependent on human connections and separated from machines, has become the elite flock. area.

Artificial intelligence, automation, Internet of Things, blockchain, and hacking technology do not save people from the appendages of capital, but completely nihilize people. People can only engage in the gig economy and do those unproductive jobs. The value of transportation, tourism, performance, nursing, or organizations serving top management, as well as those fragmented and simplified labor that will not be completed by machines for a long time in the future, people tend to be completely dominated by capital. disuse.

Of course, there are still some elite groups who need "attendants", so the "Epsteins" began to satisfy their desires infinitely. In their eyes, the value of human beings is only the value of "physique", occupying their bodies and satisfying their own desires become A single goal (of course there are other medical values).

Therefore, people are completely deprived, leaving only the most primitive "physique", which is what capital finally needs.

All the girls in the film are "beautiful", and the bullet screens are frequently "beautiful", "so beautiful", "all beauties" and so on, plus the age is between 14-23 years old, you can see the jealousy of the bullet screen, but because Afraid of being reported, he can only vent by commenting on the victim's body.

This makes one wonder, is Epstein an exception? As a kind of "physique", isn't sex, like "mental labor" and "physical labor", an element of capital operation? A kind of "ability" that can reproduce itself, intangible capital, circulating capital, if everyone hates him and secretly envy him, then is justice really that justice? All of those girls did not seek it out for money. This is a form of production organization of the times. As a resource, "sex" also flows to capital-intensive areas, so there are internal compromises among the elites and hundreds of Ten years of injustice for the victim.

Many people said that they have the taste of "you love and I wish" in the film, and also said that many people in the film very much agree with this dark life.

Thinking of this, it is still a silent, silent, silent spring. The so-called exposure and making a documentary are regarded as a kind of revolt of the times. How much meaning can this kind of history, which has been fully compromised internally, take on?

Moreover, this is not expected.

What's more, this is also a bad ethos. I don't know whether this documentary has played a destructive role (family, ethics, three views) or a maintenance role (stability, conservatism).

View more about Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich reviews