Making a movie in a movie, talking about the underground movie's struggle against Hollywood's bad movie and the commercial system, made a lot of things that many people felt and dared not do. Today, when the film is dying from the inside out, it is already visible to the naked eye, and there is nothing new under the sun, it is quite a joy to watch this film, but... I noticed that this film has a tight rhythm , which is very in line with Hollywood's screenwriting rules; the characters are all shaped, and the heroine's character arc can't be more vulgar; scolded the censorship system, but there is no dew point, no blood plasma, or even nudity (to declare that I don't like to see these)... So I found out that this movie is actually using a very mainstream way to shoot non-mainstream people, maybe it is really cheering for underground movies, but is it possible that this is just catering to the public to satisfy the public's dissatisfaction with commercial bad movies Woolen cloth? The so-called mainstream core, which is thick under the non-mainstream outer skin, is not a great irony? In addition, I must mention a place that irritates me. What's wrong with liking "Godzilla"? The films of 2000 will not always be the ones that scolded the current versions of Godzilla, right? That can only be the old version. It is true that many of its sequels may be quite bad, but the 54th version of "Godzilla" is definitely YYDS when it hits the horizon! If I slap me to death, I can't do it!
View more about Cecil B. Demented reviews
