From the perfunctory and indifferent at the very beginning, to the in-depth analysis, the whole case was vigorously discussed. Twelve jurors with rich experience and different social experience began to question the case, and made analysis and judgment based on their own experience. With the deepening of the case, you have analyzed the rational law and human sensibility, the strong and the weak, the jealousy of women, the estrangement between father and son, the public opinion, and the old-fashioned thinking. When I finally came to a conclusion, but when I knew that this matter would involve my own interests, I began to quickly find reasons to distance myself from the real human nature. The film switches to scenes of Chechen boys dancing and dead soldiers many times, from discussion to story clips, I like this narrative method very much. The context of the whole story emerges slowly and clearly from the reasoning. The stories of the jurors also have their own style. Everyone has their own stories. No one can judge a person's character based on the surface. I believe they all realized this in the end. If a person does bad things and good things, then, is he a good person or a bad person? This cannot be judged from a single point of view. Each of us hopes that when we are in a deep valley, someone can pull you and escape from loneliness and pain. Finally the boy met the man. The sparrow that flew in in the middle is very interesting, and automatically brought in the role of the boy. At the end of the film, heavy snow floats in from the window, and the light spots of the laser ball are reflected in the house, which is very beautiful. Only people can understand people, not the law. The Russian version integrates its own national characteristics well and expresses more, involving ethnic conflicts, war elements, socialism and politics. Full of ruthless irony, but also human warmth.
View more about 12 reviews
