When we watched the movie, we could know that Hopkins changed the gun at the beginning, and this was seen by Gosling, so Gosling blatantly entered into the house of Huoye and committed his crime. The process was explained again, Huo Ye admitted, then went to court stupidly, and the play ended.
There is a question here, that is, if Huo Ye never admits, what can the court do? We know that he changed the gun, but we can't prove that he changed the gun.
First, there must be no fingerprints on the gun, because Huo Ye held the gun with a handkerchief and then changed it. Second, if it was like the first court, everyone knew that he could only commit the crime. Logically speaking, Huo Ma could not. After shooting himself in the head, he dragged himself to another room, so the director used common sense to say that it was only possible that Huoye committed the crime and then caught Huoye and shot him to death. But he couldn’t find the murder weapon. Turning this case into an impossible crime, and finally getting away with justice for an hour, then everyone knows that the evidence is really important. Finally, after Gosling dismantled this clever gun-changing technique, he found evidence of the criminal method, but he could not find evidence that the prisoner was Huo Ye. Based on the above two points, if Lord Huo refuses to admit it, even if the probability of his crime changes from 98% to 99%, this case will still become an unsolved case like the first time.
Another possibility is that Gosling took a lot of police officers outside at the end. When they confronted, the police could hear their conversation completely, so the police could serve as a witness, and finally arrest him. But first, the police may not necessarily I can hear it, and the next thing is whether they can be recognized legally after they are witnesses. If they can be recognized, then at the beginning, call a bunch of policemen to say that Huo Ye happily admitted it, can't it be enough? Please explain to students who study law. I am not sure.
Later we discovered that the flaw has three endings, but now we only talk about the second ending, because the second ending and the third ending are similar.
The second ending can solve the first point mentioned above. When Gosling finally broke into Huojiazhuang, he said that Huo Ye took the police gun and used four bullets, one for killing, three for arbitrarily firing, and finally he had to use it. His own bullet was loaded, and then fingerprints would be left on the bullet, but Huo Ye might think that the classmate who gave him the green hat would eventually finish the bullet, so he didn’t wipe off the fingerprints. It’s a pity that the policeman committed suicide with a bone. Only one was used, so the fingerprints left on the remaining three can be used as evidence to prove Huo Ye’s guilt.
First, how careful people like Huo Ye leave fingerprints on bullets like this? What if he committed the crime with gloves? So isn't this a perfect crime? Such a big game, there is no flaw that is absolutely irreversible, and it is very untenable to rely on Huo Ye's carelessness to overthrow it.
Secondly, Huo was still shooting randomly in the house. One thing I don’t understand here is why Huo was so boring to shoot randomly. I don’t know if there are any substantial criminal considerations here, but I don’t know what I think. I don't think this is necessary. If I didn't shoot indiscriminately, I believe the story would still follow the original path.
Third, Gosling finally accused Huo Ye of murder. Did he shoot his wife, or did he unplug his wife’s oxygen cylinder? If it is the previous case, because her wife was not dead at the time, she still has to be considered as an attempted murder. According to the first trial, even if all the above unclear problems are resolved, Huo Ye can still travel according to the original plan. However, if it is said that he unplugged the oxygen cylinder, legally speaking, he has this right, so it is not a crime.
The third point is that there is a possibility that we first prove that Huo Ye shot his wife, and then we deny his legal right to pull out the oxygen cylinder. Both of them are considered crimes. Together they can form a murder. If the law is If you are willing to admit it.
So I think that the ending should be set to: Although Gosling understood Huo's criminal tactics, he couldn't prove it, and Huo also appreciated his talent, and the two of them went on a trip together in the end.
End of the play.
View more about Fracture reviews
