How do we understand the world, we can't understand, how do we talk about a belief that begins with the existence of the world and ends with destiny! The most difficult thing about Bresson's films is the characters (life), or in this work, the unequal beings, the black and white of human nature, the desire for power aggravates this inequality, and religion has become a spiritual belief in the film , all life it does not have a psychological characteristic in the popular sense, what drives them is unknown, in a sense this is a complete human being, neither under the religion nor deconstructed by the mind People, the existence of every life is real, we can't know and understand them, just like the unknowable between people in reality, she or he or it has fully become a kind of life individual under fate and cause and effect. confluence. In this Passion of Bassat, we see all kinds of evils through Bassat's vision. There is a father who is obsessed with suffering and neglects to care for his daughter, ignores communication with the world, is unwilling to compromise, and finally does it. The unique spiritual love, in the absence of father's love, fell in love with gangsters, and constantly degenerates Mary, the film connects a small social survival / life ecosystem with the two through Bassat... Such a presence of beings undoubtedly increases the difficulty of understanding the film, because all the characters and their performances (perhaps not called performances) are practicing Bresson's artistic concept that the authenticity created by the actor's unconscious behavior-driven expression, they transcend You cannot interpret the truth visible to our bodies with the most profound and accurate understanding. It is like interpreting a person. People cannot be interpretable. This is also an actor's performance. I think it is the most advanced form. The definition of art in the concept of performance has reached the highest standard in the true sense of film history. (Many people always think that the actors in Bresson’s films are like puppets. I think it’s very funny. Maybe I had a similar opinion in the early years, but with the deepening of the cognition of film art, the ignorance of people With more precise cognition, I began to understand that people are actually there, and no matter what form they are, they are beyond the cognition of human subjects and bystanders. This is the complexity of life forms!) Battha and The biggest difference between Mushait is that its suffering is a kind of suffering from the physical to the spiritual level, while Mushait is more of a spiritual suffering, Bassat is the carrier of his own suffering, and Bassat is both life itself. And suffering is also suffering for the world, and Mushaet's suffering is only suffering for life itself, but Mushait's suffering comes from the projection of the good and evil of all living beings. I've always thought that all sins committed against human beings (or other beings) are sins for the evildoer, and the sins of life are not immediately self-inflicted, but as Jesus suffered for the world. (For this reason, almost all religions emphasize a logic of sin before death and suffering after death, which is probably the only relief religion can give to kindness!) Even for art films, Bresson belongs to the kind of unwonderful film masters , He is not only out of tune with the mainstream, in fact, he even walks the road of art more thoroughly than others, abandoning all retreats, and in the same film time, the content he expresses is so complex, profound and thorough that there is almost no first in film history. There are two directors within reach. This is why the more I watch it, the more complicated it becomes. I can’t actually write a film review for his films, because film reviews must have a direction. Choosing one direction actually ignores other possibilities of the film. Therefore, Still that sentence, just an afterthought, I may be like this Bassat, and I don't need exact logic to express my understanding! Bresson's films are often seen and new, maybe I have to watch them from time to time in my life, and at different stages of experience to understand the Bressonian art that, in my opinion, has not yet seen the full picture! The subject of 90 points of video is actually so big that I have to say that this is a difficult film, in time, space Time, logic (maybe it can also be ignored), between characters, I think there are still deficiencies! There is almost no fault in other aspects of the film as a whole, so I deducted the points from the image level! The script is 100 points from the suffering of a donkey to see the evils of the world! Batsa is another life dimension of Mushaette, so it is not as streamlined as Mushaette, but bigger than Mushaette. This is the sentient being in Bresson's eyes, but the protagonist has changed from a human to a donkey, which doesn't surprise me, on the contrary. There is a strong care and compassion transmitted from the whole film! The director 100 points performs 100 points of contemporary actors, or from Bresson's works, to see the highest form of actor performance, or from painting, music and other dimensional arts to achieve a deeper drive from the inside out The possibility of acting, I think what is going on with acting? It still has to be discussed at the artistic level, and cannot be limited to human emotions and experiences. It is too subjective to express. Expression is a person’s desire to vent and release, but performance, the ultimate artistic pursuit, should be based on the spiritual core of human beings. Root-seeking journey! 100 points for innovation, 98 points for works, 98 points for content coefficient 1, 98 points for film history
View more about Au hasard Balthazar reviews
