Lost Cause
Are Mexico, where slavery is banned, and Texas, where slavery is strictly enforced, a revolution or a counter-revolution?
It would be too brazen to call a revolution a rebellion in a country that did not allow slavery to establish a slave regime. Texas independence, or rebellion, was unquestionably counter-revolutionary. This chain of counter-revolutionary actions has been linked to the rebellion of 1861.
Not one of the leaders of the Texas rebellion was not a slave owner or a slave trader, whether it was Austin, Houston, Bowie, or Travis, Fanning. They feared the Mexican government's abolition of slavery in Texas, which was at the heart of their rebellion.
It doesn't matter at this point that the Mexican government is dictatorship (not that it is wrong to be against dictatorship) because the Texas rebellion was driven by slavery, not the Mexican government dictatorship - as it would have been in democratic America rebellion.
In all those ignorant touts, no one realized that the Texas Rebellion was only part of the nefarious attempt of the counter-revolutionary slavery forces throughout the American Revolution . Did no one know that the Texas Rebellion turned the land out of slavery into the land of enslaved people, or did they just turn a blind eye to that fact and subscribe to the Texas Constitution's statement that blacks and Indians are not human beings?
Texas was the last lair of slavery, until June 1865, when the Union Army marched into Galveston and announced President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation three years earlier, slavery was difficult to eradicate. . In 1866, the new governor publicly accepted the end of slavery in Texas, but he also expressed his desire for a slavery-like system of forced labor. In the following time, with the raging of the KKK and the implementation of the "Jim Crow Law", the new system is indeed very similar to slavery.
So Gods and Generals is rubbish, and for the same reason The Alamo is rubbish. These films are all part of the propaganda of a failed cause , and it seems that these lies have propaganda effects among ignorant people.
Freedom, democracy, civil rights, strong, brave, independent spirit, fraternity, dedication
This shows that Americans are really a group of idealistic angry youth
Their ideal of being a world policeman lies in their bones
This kind of trait that you have to fork yourself with two knives to save others when you can't eat enough
It has nothing to do with being strong or not.
This impassioned chant is truly hilarious.
It is very strange to use this sentence to describe the lackeys of slavery. The so-called behavior of saving others when they are not hungry is referring to the Texas "hero" Sam Houston who enslaved more than a dozen black people, or is it referring to the Jim Bowie, the Texas "martyr" who made huge profits from the slave trade? Oh, and you never mention slavery, just like these films don't mention slavery as the cause of the Texas Rebellion.
Strength, bravery, fraternity, dedication, these noble qualities are undoubtedly abolitionist , especially the latter. Those slave-owners and minions can't be said to be brave and dedicated for the sake of fraternity. On the contrary, they are mortal enemies with the abolitionists who liberate mankind for the sake of enslaving mankind. The slavery forces never recognized fraternity—in their Texas Constitution, it was clear that African Americans and Indians had no human rights.
I urge you to read more ethical historians and less Hollywood movies.
Lost Cause
Movie
View more about The Alamo reviews
