The story of this film is actually not complicated. It is that a Yankee kidnapped the child of a nobleman, and then ran to the country to let these people help him watch the child, and he came to carry out blackmail and extortion.
So since it is a story of kidnapping, why do most of the pages in the end tell the story of two little boys? I think the director's intention may still be at the educational level.
When we were young, adults always taught us some worldly correctness, but when these correctnesses themselves could not stand up to scrutiny, adults were instantly dumbfounded. They can't tell you logically that life is hard because the upper echelons exploit us, no, because he knows you don't understand.
But he used his actions to tell the children how absurd the world of adults is.
The figure who seems to be busy all day is for the well-being of the family, but does not do business. Doing some specious things all day long, even if you kidnap a child, and you have no professionalism, what if the boy is locked in a black hole, what if he dies?
They must have thought about it, but they will not completely ignore it. Therefore, regular food delivery is a channel for them to obtain psychological salvation. However, they are so amateur after all, so even deciding who will kill the child seems so absurd.
The protagonist is a very innocent child. Although he is deep in the eighteenth-tier town, he does not act as insensitive as their parents. Therefore, people are inherently good at the beginning, and they can actually stand up to scrutiny.
For the picture, it really makes us have to reminisce about our childhood. The familiar wheat meadows, the familiar playmates, the bicycles that don't look very bright, all tell us that childhood anecdotes are the happiest time in a person's life.
To this day, whenever I look back on my childhood, I still think it was the best time I ever had.
View more about I'm Not Scared reviews
