After reading a lot of film reviews, I think Mrs. Bao Mana on the first floor wrote the best. It is true that many film reviews are not badly written or vivid. It's just that the core is definitely deviated. The theme of this movie is definitely not genius and lunatic, reality and ideal. I admit there is this ingredient, but it's really just decoration. The child itself is like a prop that can write poetry. At an age where it is difficult to speak, what do you expect this child to perform? Anything more is just an over-interpretation. The focus is even less on poetry. Don't look at this as the key to the plot, but the whole two poems are also pretences. What is the center of gravity? In addition to the previous views of Madame Bovary. What else can we see? It is the tendency of this female director, the value output. This value output exists in every movie. This film is no exception. The title of the film is "Kindergarten Teacher", and we inevitably have to discuss whether she is doing it right or not. The Madame Bovary theory is at the heart of the characters. What's at the heart of the film's problem? That's the kind of person who does this, right? And the director gave this teacher all the justice. With her, the child developed the ability to write poetry, and it was getting better and better. At the recital, the teacher was so eager for a person who was talented and eager to be recognized, but he didn't take it for himself without his conscience. Also continuously train children to speak and recite. The child goes to play with her, swims and writes poetry. The child was afraid and wanted to call the police. She told the number and the address. Constant emphasis on no malice. Crucially, the child was put into a police car and said to write a poem. There are many interpretations of this ending, some of which deviate far. The point of the movie is not with the kid. In the end, he was going to write poetry, and no one would record it, pay attention to it, and give him a response. This is the final blow. The director wants to say, she does it, yes. No matter how many plots before it suppressed the teacher's wishes. In the end, the teacher did the right thing. Only in this way can people bring out their greatest value and talents. It is a pity that we do not have such a reckless kindergarten teacher around us. The film hints at several future personalities of this so-called gifted child. Then use the actions of the female teacher to prove it, so be good to him. The child's father said that he should be pragmatic and make money. Is there something wrong? There is definitely nothing wrong with a child's life. He thinks that if he develops like this, he will become his uncle, and he is not even an editor, which is nonsense. It developed into her son's second-year junior high school, her daughter's marijuana youth, and her husband's middle-aged greasy, all of which are not good. Or not good enough. In the end, her integration into the family was not all about forcing herself to return to life. It's more like saying goodbye to family. Because the camera directly cut her to take a suitcase and leave. She has made up her mind to protect Mozart or the Mozart in her heart in her own way. But the result was already doomed. So I think, the core of the film is that suddenly there is a kindergarten teacher who is charging and doing such a good job.
View more about The Kindergarten Teacher reviews
