It took two nights to finish it. On the first night, I watched the disc I bought. The so-called English subtitles are similar to those translated by google. There are also pinyin orz in it. I can only roughly understand the meaning. Version. The biggest feeling is that there is no need to make a movie, and it will be very good to play it directly. I watched the download on the second night, and the quality of the Chinese subtitles was good, basically in line with the understanding and... conjecture of the previous night, and I finished reading it very smoothly. Very serious movie, late at night, refreshed and unable to sleep, and ended up being sleepy and having a headache all day.
The story is about a Chechen boy whose parents died in the war as a child. He is adopted by a Russian military officer and later charged with the murder of his adoptive father. A jury of 12 was about to decide his case, so it was discussed in the back room (an elementary school gym). The case dragged on for a long time, and everyone was looking forward to convicting him and leaving. Unexpectedly, there was a juror who didn't think he was guilty from the very beginning. This person is the most unusual of the 12 - well, it must be said that I fainted when the 12 appeared in front of me, a bunch of actors who I can't name but have seen their respective movies, the director doesn't have to Say, and Zavulon...and the actors in the movies like the submarine sinking - he enters the gym and quietly puts a Madonna card on a display case, and goes over every time he encounters resistance from other people Watching it draw strength, but this card was revealed at the end, and there was no frontal photo during the film.
The reason for the acquittal vote is very simple. The fate of a person should not be decided so hastily with a single gesture, but only if 12 people agree, so he must vote against it. The simple reason immediately raised moral awareness in others, and a Jewish juror quickly changed his stance. There is only one person who firmly believes that he is guilty, and his reason is the sensitive theme of the film, the national issue. He is full of hatred and fear for the Chechens, and regards them as gangsters. Of course, he has his reasons. The conflict is known all over the world, as well as those horrific events. And one juror happened to be from the Caucasus and went to a medical school in Moscow to become a surgeon, but the haters satirized the Caucasians for buying diplomas. It is conceivable that the two would clash. Haters were also hostile to Jews, but Jewish jurors were self-deprecatingly tolerant.
I keep thinking that compared to 9/11, I paid more attention to Kursk (of course, this has nothing to do with the Chechen war...) and Moscow hostages. After my brother took office, the bad things happened one after another. Pile... I read newspapers and follow-up reports on the news every day, and my heart is heavy...
When both parties try to persuade each other, they must know it with reason and emotion, and some of them have told part of their experiences, like One of the lines in it is a very Russian story, so I won't repeat it. For details, see the plot introduction attached later. The basic idea is that the hope of innocence can give boys more attention, the indifference among people can even kill fragile lives, and a little more attention may have an unexpected saving effect. There is the so-called ironclad evidence. This is thanks to Zawulong. He originally supported the guilt, but when everyone was arguing, he found data for reasoning analysis. In fact, he just pointed out an obvious possibility. It is difficult to imagine that there was no such thing as a Some people mentioned that it may be regarded as an artistic exaggeration to highlight the unreasonableness of this trial (and the so-called unique Chechen saber used as a murder weapon, which can actually be bought in Moscow), because the suspect is a poor Chechen , the dead were the great Russian officers.
After the jurors' sense of responsibility was slowly awakened, there was also a sneer-like replay of the incident in order to check the reliability of the witness's testimony, and the result was slightly favorable for the boy. However, the hypothesis put forward by Zavulon is more lethal - the friend of the deceased killed the officer and blamed his adopted son. The boy's story is interspersed with the jury's discussion and slowly confessed. Each interlude ends with a black thing walking from a distance in the rain on the battlefield of the dead body, and a clear shot is given at the end of the film. What came was a black dog with an arm in his mouth, frozen. Zavulong's inference basically made the case clear, and the witness was a woman who had a crush on the deceased, who gave perjury out of jealousy - and it was also deduced - everyone knew that he was guilty.
As everyone chose to listen to their hearts, the hater finally had to admit that he also thought the boy was innocent in conscience. Just as the agreement was about to be reached, the director became the only one who still insisted on guilt. Before he said the reason, I had expected it, so the rhino had to jpgd all over the floor. This is almost a metaphysical reason, but it must be raised in the discussion of pros and cons, otherwise there will be loopholes. That is, is it possible that prison is better for boys than outside the walls. An extremely poor orphaned child in Chechen, carrying the charge of killing his Russian adoptive father, whether it is unwarranted or not, and if he is really blamed, how can the person who blamed him be willing to let it go? How is his safety guaranteed, how is his life guaranteed? It was a very real question, and the stern-faced jurors startled me, and for a split second I thought the ending of the movie would unexpectedly stay within the walls. Fortunately, it's metaphysical after all, and you can't never go out just because you're worried about being hit by a billboard. It took so much effort to convince himself to accept the fact of innocence, and he would not easily let a setback fight back. 12 acquittals passed.
The truth is revealed, the boy was indeed framed, but the murderer is still at large. The director temporarily took in the boy, leaving a hope that he would always go somewhere and that the murderer would be caught. The boy doesn't speak Russian well, and he hardly speaks in the film, only two times, when he was a child and twice in prison, he provoked a folk dance. There was never despair in his eyes, he always carried a kind of simple recklessness, even if not Knowing the truth, I had no doubts about his innocence from the first minute.
The identities and backgrounds of the 12 jurors are not explained one by one. Everything is revealed in their speech and behavior. Judging from their performance, it is almost certain that no matter what their positions are, they are not people without at least justice and moral bottom line. , but they were more or less submerged in their different classes of life, succumbing to ordinary individualism, but after being forced to think deeply, they can also reflect on themselves, and they are all good people who can be awakened to reality.
One of the interesting things about the film is that it involves many social realities in Russia, such as ethnic issues, institutional issues, urban expansion, the gap between the rich and the poor, education issues, self-lost, human indifference, alcoholism and drug abuse (the plot in the attachment is wrong, A certain juror did not take drugs, he was an actor, and he imitated it vividly) and so on, many details outlined this country and nation with thick lines, and even corrected the use of Russian in a humorous manner.
I don't know if the original 12 Angry Men has been brought to the stage. This format may be novel on the screen, but I still think it is more suitable for long-term performances on the stage, especially if it is replaced with the Russian version of the core. The case can be displayed on the big screen on the stage, or it can be performed directly on the stage, because the scene switching is very concise, in short, I think it is very suitable for adaptation into a drama, and the drama conflict is very clear. In fact, I agree with an evaluation: there is creativity, but ideas are greater than art, that is, art is more experimental than visible. But it's a matter of opinion, in fact I think it's very watchable and relish. Nikita's films I've seen seem to leave a consistent impression. He is a very thoughtful director with an ideal feeling for Russia. The stories he tells may be true and believable, but he can't bear it. Live in a way with an ideal halo, to give the country the color he wants her to have, and that's why I like his films so much. Because of the distance, I had to see her through my own imagination.
The feeling of reading it is the same as usual, and it is transparent. I haven't watched Lust, Caution, and I'm not as interested in watching as I thought a few months ago. Apart from not buying Eileen Chang, and my shameful conservativeness, I don't believe that I have to be naked to show it. Reason, desire, sentiment, especially in such dire times, I really don't buy the account of petty feelings. Although I'm not naive enough to think that the Inzarovs will be alone, but I prefer the ability to be handsome without gimmicks. Digressing... As usual, I felt penetrating as the last giant red sun rose. 12 Finally, when the jury quietly came back and put away the card of the Madonna that gave him the strength to bless the boy—that bird was the boy, I felt clear. No matter how many ideal colors are painted, they are all serious and sincere works. What they want to give the audience is not even enjoyment, but thinking and conscience together. If the heart is slightly touched, it is enough.
http://shawxx.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C75C78C8E80335DE!3951.entry
View more about 12 reviews
