If this film was made by Google or Amazon, I have nothing to say. Google has the demeanor of IBM decades ago, and it should be said that it is committed to promoting technological progress (maybe even stronger than that of IBM); and the Amazon boss himself has an aerospace business.
But unfortunately, it was shot by the iron rooster Apple that fell into the eyes of money, which is a perfect irony in itself.
Why did America's space dominance come to an abrupt end after the moon landing? Quite simply, because rentiers adhere to the principle of "you do the work, and I make the money", just like Apple. The American system has evolved into a protector of this principle. The rich second generation will not choose aerospace departments in college. They prefer to rely on the profits of aerospace companies as investors, and use a bunch of financial theories to analyze a company. The prospects of rocket-building companies, and their fate.
In addition, since it is not science fiction, it is troublesome to be objective. The moon landing project had already reached the technical limit at that time, and it was impossible to take advantage of the victory to catch up in the 1970s. Whether it is the design software, the control system or the processing technology, there have been huge improvements in the following years. If you want to criticize, what should be criticized is the decay of Boeing and Lockheed Martin after 2000. Please don't make fun of the NASA guys, they make far less than the Boeing execs.
How do people who don't understand technology feel like watching such a film? I think I will support Dada Peng's death order to return to the moon in 2024, and then continue to elect President Dada, and support increased investment in Boeing......
However, the times have changed (the foundation of technology has changed), and the development of the aerospace era requires small companies with a hundred flowers blooming, a relaxed corporate culture, a high degree of information sharing, and all kinds of tempered geek gods bring all kinds of low costs. Only technology can realize the development of Mars, relying on the government to directly fund one or two large companies, and the result must be that the government has become the ATM of this company.…
View more about For All Mankind reviews
