history

Nola 2022-04-03 08:01:01

Because it is a real event, a lot of legal content in the film needs to be understood, but this is also an important content of the film. Once you understand it, you will understand how wonderful it is! There is nothing special about the film itself. Perhaps the director's personal cognition or scruples did not allow the film to have a higher ideological improvement and in-depth discussion, but it is worth adding one more star to present such a sensitive topic to the audience. . Emotional cognitive enthusiasm cannot win the truth of history. Rational response will make the truth more respected by future generations. Blind abuse and ignorant atrocities will only make opponents more ecstatic and win more audiences. In the resurgence of the future, history will face more difficult challenges

View more about Denial reviews

Extended Reading
  • Concepcion 2022-04-09 09:01:08

    The plot is complete, the conflict is sharp, the rhythm is relaxed, and the rational and emotional balance is just right. The trial is not for healing, but for giving the survivors the greatest comfort in a dignified way. Following "The Defender", another time for legal affairs.

  • Ora 2022-04-04 09:01:08

    A strong, confident, tolerant society has a broad mind to accommodate dissidents, no matter how ridiculous their dissents may be. To be right is to be wrong. Only one voice must be wrong.

Denial quotes

  • Richard Rampton: The coward threatens only where he is safe.

    [Quoting Goethe: "Der Feige droht nur, wo er sicher ist"]

  • Richard Rampton: My lord, during this trial, we have heard from Professor Evans and others of at least 25 major falsifications of history. Well, says Mr. Irving, "all historians make mistakes." But there is a difference between negligence, which is random in its effect, and a deliberateness, which is far more one-sided. All Mr. Irving's little fictions, all his tweaks of the evidence all tend in the same direction: the exculpation of Adolf Hitler. He is, to use an analogy, like the waiter who always gives the wrong change. If he is honest, we may expect sometimes his mistakes to favor the customers, sometimes himself. But Mr. Irving is the dishonest waiter. All his mistakes work in his favor. How far, if at all, Mr. Irving's Antisemitism is the cause of his Hitler apology, or vice versa, is unimportant. Whether they are taken together or individually, it is clear that they have led him to prostitute his reputation as a serious historian in favor of a bogus rehabilitation of Adolf Hitler and the dissemination of virulent Antisemitic propaganda.