But I still read it patiently and seriously, and objectively speaking, it is not disgusting.
If there is no biography, maybe I will look at it as a literary film or something. After all, the content of the film more or less moved me.
As a child, Diane often stood by the window and looked out. She said, I was looking for my kingdom, but I never found it. Follows deformed people with physical defects out of youthful curiosity, eager to inquire about life in another world that deviates from normal people. "I've never had any misfortune, so I've been living with a feeling of unreality. Her pictures and inspirations come from a strong inner desire and inquiry. She's different.
And Nicole Key in the film After discovering that her behavioral awareness was abnormal, Deman kept emphasizing herself. I must be brave, I must be brave. She is just a woman who has lost herself in panic and lost herself.
The appearance of her hirsutous neighbor aroused her inner fear. The discovered side. Between love and betrayal, she made the bravest choice again. She found the wonderful feeling of those worlds with dwarf transvestites, and the death of her lover made her pick up again The camera. Let her re-examine an unknown world, she indulges in the pleasure of taking pictures of them, that is her real kingdom.
In the celestial concentration camp, she strips naked, puts down the camera, she and them in such an equal way Talking for respect and trust. At the end of the film, on the bench outside. Diane and the same naked girl. Can we exchange a
secret? Her secret is to fall in love with a hirsutical man with a clear lingering spirit who dies under the watchful eye of his lover. He takes her into a wondrous and incredible world, the kingdom she dreamed of as a child.
The film completely distorts Diane's original purpose of shooting, and perhaps it is not necessarily ethical. Betraying her husband and family and marrying a strange man is not Diane's bravery and strength, let alone her original intention to take pictures.
Overall, it's not as shocking as I imagined it to be, but it's still a movie worth watching, not a good biographical movie, but a good movie nonetheless. If you remove the word biography. . . .
It is worth mentioning that Ellen Arbus in the film is somewhat similar to the real person.
View more about Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus reviews
