I haven't watched a movie for a long time, I missed 2046, and Hoh Xil also released the film. The promotional film of "Tiger Brother and Tiger Brother" is quite attractive to me, although I always thought that it might be better to call it "Tiger and Me".
It was shot by the French, but it seems to tell the story of an Englishman, which happened in the old colonial era. I wasn't very happy after reading it, the decoration made me depressed to the extreme, and general entertainment couldn't cheer me up.
The post-80s generation has become a synonym, but these people are far away from my life. They are still young and cannot understand that life is not a vision. When life crosses a hurdle, life will inevitably begin to go downhill. Recalling that when we were young, we looked forward to the quiz, the middle school entrance examination, and the college entrance examination, and found that there was no way for us to look forward to anything in life. We will work day after day until we retire. After retirement, we will Our bodies are aging, our strength has plummeted, and we can only wait for death to end all these.
In this world where the strong eat the weak, human beings, as the masters of the world, seem to have transformed themselves and can become stronger in front of the beasts. Someone made such a story as The film even uses this as a textbook to protect them, but in the reinforced concrete forest, who is the weak in this huge group of humans? Whose sympathy might we even get, and whose protection is it? Is our destiny the same as that of the tiger, or is it opposite?
I said far, let's talk about the movie.
The director and the cameraman were so intently capturing the eyes of the tigers that we couldn't understand their language and we might even doubt our eyes, but the director and cameraman managed to get all the details to them with real animal actors (The director) wants to express everything. So we look at the camera and have feelings of pity, sympathy, anger and so on. What's the feeling that I like, it's great screenwriters, making them completely personified, they have their own personalities, their own destiny, and these may have been unique to human beings, and for that, we have to think, What is the difference between humans and living things? Are we just smarter than them in using tools, or are we really capable of producing a higher and richer emotional life than them?
The younger brother was originally very lucky. He was weak and was more protected by his mother, and then adopted by a rich man, but after the wildness after being bullied by the dog for the first time broke out in his body, he was sent away. Fear accompanies it, but promotes his growth. The older brother was ill-fated, was sold into the circus, but was suppressed by the courage to live, and when he was finally besieged by humans, he successfully used the flame that humans always thought they were afraid of, and encouraged the younger brother.
In this story, their strengths and weaknesses are constantly changing. This is human thinking. I don't know how far this truth can go in the natural world? Is it true that we can't define the real strong, or is it that on a spiritual level, as long as we don't admit defeat, we can create miracles, as is the case with humans, and so with living things?
The detail I like is that when they escaped from the cage, the elder brother returned to the cage habitually until the younger brother was calling for it, and it seemed to have gone through a ideological struggle and walked back with the younger brother. The road to home, and on the road, he is still used to jumping between two tree stumps, as if he is still facing the audience's performance, but his brother is the only audience at the moment, maybe he will show some mockery, maybe he will. I scolded the sentence, "Damn you, is this worth it?"
People will play many roles in their lives, and I really don't know which one I can be.
The best supporting role, the one I like is really a king, tired of his father's fame all his life.
They are really attentive, but the ears are wrong. In fact, it is really hard for me to imagine that it can really know that it is the ear that it shot, maybe he is really showing mercy? Actually a sharpshooter?
I like him sitting in front of his younger brother, one king talking to another king, although they don't speak the same language, but maybe they can understand each other, sometimes, the person who knows you best is your enemy.
What is the distance between cowardice and courage? Having said that, my thinking has turned a corner again. This is what I wanted to express in Yujingzi, but unfortunately, it is not perfect. .
If I really like this film, it is not always true. I always feel that the director wants to express too many things. Through the eyes of a tiger, it seems to be through the eyes of a pair of innocent children, to see the money between people. Friendship, watching, competing for power, and watching the sound of gunfire, watching them destroy cultural relics, gave me a feeling of success and failure.
It is successful to anthropomorphize them, but sometimes it is too anthropomorphic, and it seems that the realism is much worse.
When he came back, He Xiaobai kept talking about how feasible it is to release animals into nature.
Or the most important thing to change is that we don't take care and adopt them hypocritically, but let them live in their world, although I always feel that in a world where the strong eat the weak, the sympathy of the strong is worthless.
View more about Two Brothers reviews
