I just watched the first episode of the first season in which a group of people drew a timeline on the whiteboard, and then everyone seemed to be busy and able to deduce, and I felt a little interested. But when I saw the back, I started to get bored. Most of the plot revolves around 9/11 and its aftermath. There are crazy husbands whose wife died unexpectedly in 9/11 and decided to take revenge on his wife's colleagues, and there are tragic Middle Eastern doctors who are discriminated against but have integrity. After watching a few episodes later, it seems that they are all going in that direction. I don't know if it was three years after that time, and the director and screenwriter dared to start making a fuss about the pain. The large-scale description and the protracted footage made it unclear about the character of the main character handling the case. I'm too lazy to read it all.
But since the second season is down, I watched it by the way and found that the quality is much better than the first season. The style of the whole play moved closer to CSI, and began to play the popular card of humanity. There are more sensational pictures, more close-ups of characters, and the cameras are no longer shooting the time line that is no longer innovative for a long time. Many of the actors who participated in the filming are well-known and well-known, and they seem to be more cordial than before.
View more about
Without a Trace reviews
