It's not so much feminism, it's more of a patriarchal + political satire movie.
The structure is also complete, but there is always a little uncomfortable feeling.
From the beginning to the description of the parthenogenetic society is still very attractive. I imagined that the parthenogenetic society would be discussed well, but it turned out that the direction was not right.
From the moment the man touches the woman and the woman faints, the story begins to collapse.
If you are touched by a man, you will faint, why don't you go to heaven?
The premise of this kind of plot is that women must be prostrate under the man's "penis" (a sexual symbol).
I arbitrarily guess that this is to satirize the parthenoic society that does not exist (in other words, it believes that men are complete), which is contrary to the parthenoic society that feminism wants to express.
When a woman depicts a parthenogenetic society, it is absolutely impossible for a woman to be inexplicably captured by a man's penis.
From another angle, what would happen if a woman came to write about a solitary society and a woman suddenly appeared? Will a man be fascinated and fainted when he is touched by a woman?
It is indeed a political satire to call a man a woman during the debate, but the two men said that history and civilization were built by men. ?
These two men have always taken men's domination of women for granted, and then using the result of men's enslavement of women to prove that women are not good is like: locking monkeys in a zoo, and then using the fact that monkeys are in zoos to prove that monkeys are not. Just as suitable for survival in the wild, it is completely sophistry.
The escape process that followed was too nonsense, and in order to specially send women to these two men, they deliberately made insufficient protective clothing, which was too rigid.
Until the end, it was finally revealed that the so-called parthen society was fake, and they were just slaves of a few men.
This film has two themes, male and female confrontation + political satire. Both of them are not well done. When combined, it cannot be said to be too bad, but I always feel that it is not profound and too superficial.
In addition, by the way, there is a similar movie "The Shimmering City", just mention it, not comment.
View more about Sexmission reviews
