Obviously, the theme of this play is - anti-discrimination, black, transgender, the bottom of the sexist chain, which is really a good theme. Unfortunately, I don't know whether it is due to the limitation of space or the limitation of the theme (I think it is more due to the cognitive reasons of the director/screenwriter), but under the appearance of anti-discrimination, this drama is also expressing another layer of discrimination. The specific object—— The male sponsor of Stan and Elektra, one young and one old.
The male sponsors of Stan and Elektra, both old and young versions of the same type of people, both prefer pseudo-girls to "real" women (so there is no need to pay for cheating or money for a "real" woman), Specifically, it likes the coexistence of bisexual characteristics. They (actually us, I said it myself) are not gay or bisexual, but belong to a smaller gender group (currently software such as facebook has begun to have gender segmentation for smaller groups, but it is too hot Brain, I did not go into detail).
For such groups, the director/screenwriter obviously doesn't want to say much. The appearance of the male sponsors of Stan and Elektra is basically to promote the plot - the ideological/economic independence of Elektra and Angel exists, which is no problem. But obviously the director/screenwriter conceived it with the mentality of "don't understand and don't want to understand" and "asking is perverted", and the director prefers to define this orientation as the perversion of middle-class men - through Stan's self-report - to escape False success, false upper class, and a shortcut to a masked life, the director defines this orientation as "revenge for the false life of successful people", which also represents the public opinion. However, isn't this discrimination, and how is it different from the gay community for transgender people - that is, they think they are perverted and sick. The director wanted to counter discrimination, but he did not counteract his own discrimination.
Of course, even if there are more or less deficiencies, this is still a wonderful drama, just the soundtrack, makeup, costumes, and production are enough for a four-star evaluation. It's just that it's 2020s now, and it's a bit of a pity that there's not yet a drama about a smaller gender genre.
There are too many Internet trolls, I will block a few of their lines first. 1. As for the moral critics who have been derailed, you can rest. Who has a real moral outlook in this play? The relationship between Stan and Angel, Elektra and the male sponsor is an obvious support relationship (from this essence, the male sponsor of Elektra is definitely not a poor sponsor. I spend money to buy your bisexual body, and it has been for more than ten years. Integrity remains the same, if you don't want to provide it, I will leave and find another person, there is nothing to say.); 2. As for the emotional guards who always talk about "scum", I never dare to agree with the statement of scumbags/scumbags , what do you think is the most ignorant act? It is pointing fingers at the emotional behavior of others.
View more about Pose reviews
