The narration of the film is good for pursuing new ideas, but at least it can't make people feel unreasonable. For example, where the male protagonist woke up at the beginning, he didn't explain what was going on before and after.
A meeting changes a person's life, an advertisement changes the whole world, director, what are you kidding me for. Fassbender said that for things that cannot be changed, people should at least describe (quote from the original book), not go to the second to mess around.
If it is an excellent director, he will give the reader the story of how the male protagonist and Sophie became friends. Who knows if you describe how the two got together, and presumably set both of them to be involved. Really feelings, sex and love are the same thing?
The world's largest advertising company actually relies on a yogurt seller to support 39% of its sales, and an advertising planning company actually shoots commercials, and shoots a pickle commercial so free, and it is half a dime from the theme of the movie relation? The chaos of performance ad shoots?
Why set the male protagonist to pursue ideals and shoot commercials, is it very heroic? Don't you feel like a waste of ink?
The male protagonist is stupid because Dürer vetoed an advertisement design. Can he follow the original book? Don't turn the original good satirical advertising design into the male protagonist's petty temper.
Why did Mark commit suicide? Why did the male lead suddenly get promoted? Why does Jeff suddenly have the right to fire the male lead? To express the absurdity of life? In the original work, there is a story that has a beginning and a tail, but the director has so arbitrarily tampered with it, and it can't be explained by the logic of the original work, so the filming is neither friendly to the audience who have not seen the original work, nor is it friendly to the audience who have seen the original work, God!
In the first ending, Mark faked his death? It's too easy for you to fake death in France, what's the point of inserting this paragraph when the male protagonist is arrested, the double destruction of love in life?
In the second ending, the male protagonist fled to a deserted island, which is indeed ironic, but you expect a pampered nobleman to lead a primitive life and pull the female protagonist up.
Other people's random narrative is to enhance the expressive effect of the film, but many of the director's random narrative is unreasonable to increase the difficulty for readers to watch the movie.
The rhythm of the narrative is not well grasped, but on the basis of not saying the things that should be explained, I have the mood to set two endings (for example, Dulyo Tamara, watching the movie is super abrupt and meaningless).
The whole movie is supported by the male lead's acting skills.
More importantly, I am a novel fan, but the director is free to play away from the novel, and respects the original work in details, which reminds people of the common sense plot of the original.
In the end, he said that the original book is very exciting and the criticism is very strong, and the movie is not as good as it is. One more star for the original.
View more about 99 francs reviews
