After watching this movie, I was completely blown away. The frame, the narrative rhythm, the details, the ending, the whole story.
Who in the end lost himself? People who live in groups do not suddenly think of philosophical questions.
I don't know what intrigue is, let alone what hypocrisy, lies, and serious speech is trained, Pav's cognition is far from enough to fight alone in society. Pav is just a childhood hero. He has never really touched the "world of adults" and has to put on the skin of an adult. He seems to be well-behaved but has no soul.
Love is not necessarily innate in humans, but sexual urges must be innate in adult mammals. Complexity is not the person itself, but the society, the work, and the atmosphere. Not to mention being changed, people just adapt to the environment. We, who cannot liberate our nature, will not be as pitiful as the animals that are admired in the zoo, right? There is no schadenfreude here, but I just hope that I will not be too sympathetic to others.
What Puff needs is maternal love (all men have Oedipus complex) here is just an exaggeration to say that when a man he has no career, no thoughts, no ambition, he just wants to have breasts, which can make him feel at ease baby. The French woman who is full of sweet words and pretentiousness can just play this role. I don't know how long she can pretend to be. At least now she has deceived Pav. Pav and the male protagonist are both caught in this.
At the end, it seems that Pav has told a lie that is touching and logically almost perfect. Only the expression on Pav's face when he gets into the car is the real answer. He looked at the forest outside the car window, followed by his French lover, did he know what he wanted? The answer is: don't know.
The dialogue throughout the film is quite humorous. Suddenly I thought of a sentence someone said: When we look at the orangutan in the zoo, the orangutan may also think: what is so good about the same species?
View more about Human Nature reviews
